Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T17:43:12.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Different Glass and Zeolite-a Compositions on the Leach Resistance of Ceramic Waste Forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

M. A. Lewis
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Chemical Technology Division, Argonne, IL 60439
M. Hash
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Chemical Technology Division, Argonne, IL 60439
D. Glandorf
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Chemical Technology Division, Argonne, IL 60439
Get access

Abstract

A ceramic waste form is being developed at Argonne National Laboratory for waste generated during the electrometallurgical treatment of spent nuclear fuel. The waste is generated when fission products are removed from the electrolyte, LiCI-KCl eutectic. The ceramic waste form is a composite, fabricated by hot isostatic pressing a mixture of glass frit and zeolite occluded with fission products and salt. Past work has shown that the normalized release rate (NRR) is less than 1 g/m2d for all elements in a Material Characterization Center-Type 1 (MCC-1) leach test run for 28 days in deionized water at 90°C (363 K). This leach resistance is comparable to that of early Savannah River glasses. We are investigating how leach resistance is affected by changes in the cationic form of zeolite and in the glass composition. Composites were made with three forms of zeolite A and six glasses. We used three-day ASTM C1220–92 (formerly MCC-1) leach tests to screen samples for development purposes only. The leach test results show that the glass composites of zeolites 5A and 4A retain fission products equally well. The loss of cesium is small, varying from 0.1 to 0.5 wt%, while the loss of divalent and trivalent fission products is one or more orders of magnitude smaller. Composites of 5A retain chloride ion better in these short-term screens than 4A and 3A. The more leach resistant composites were made with durable glasses that were rich in silica and poor in alkaline earth oxides. The x-ray diffraction (XRD) results show that a salt phase was absent in the leach resistant composites of 5A and the better glasses but was present in the other composites with poorer leach performance. Thus, the data show that the absence of a salt phase in a composite's XRD pattern corresponds to improved leach resistance. The data also suggest that the interactions between the zeolite and glass depend on the composition of both.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Lewis, M. A., Fischer, D. F. and Murphy, C. D., “Properties of Glass-Bonded Zeolite Monoliths”, Environmental and Waste Management Issues in the Ceramic Industry II, Am. Ceram. Soc, Westerville, OH, pp. 279286 (1994).Google Scholar
[2] Lewis, M. A., Fischer, D. F., and Murphy, C. D., “Densification of Salt-Occluded Zeolite A Powders to a Leach Resistant Monolith”, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Eds., Barkatt, A. and Van Konynenburg, R., Vol. 333, pp. 277284, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA (1994)Google Scholar
[3]Standard Test Method for Static Leaching of Monolithic Waste Forms for Disposal of Radioactive Waste,” ASTM C1220–92, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA (1995)Google Scholar
[4] Plodenie, M. J., Wicks, G. G., and Bibler, N. E., An Assessment of Savannah River Borosilicate Glass in the Repository Environment, DP-1629, Savannah River Laboratory, Aiken SC (1982).Google Scholar
[5] Hash, M. C., Pereira, C., Lewis, M. A., Blaskovitz, R. J., Zyryanov, V., and Ackerman, J. P., “Hot Isostatic Pressing of Glass-Zeolite Composites”, to be published in Environmental Issues and Waste Management Technologies in the Ceramic and Nuclear Industries (1996).Google Scholar
[6] Breck, D. W., Zeolite Molecular Sieves, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1974).Google Scholar
[7] Pereira, C., Zyryanov, V. N., Lewis, M. A., and Ackerman, J. P., “Mixing of Zeolite Powders and Molten Salt,” to be published in Environmental Issues and Waste Management Technologies in the Ceramic and Nuclear Industries (1996).Google Scholar