Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T12:48:34.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Grain Size on Corrosion Fatigue of A537 Steel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Qing Wang  and
Yu-Jiu Song
Qing Wang
Affiliation:
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2300
Yu-Jiu Song
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science & Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
Get access

Abstract

The influence of grain size on corrosion fatigue behavior of A537 steel in 0.1M HCL solution has been studied. The results show that the increase of grain size can improve the corrosion fatigue crack growth resistance. But the change of crack growth rate da/dN with average grain diameter D is not monotonic. When D>40 μm, crack propagates little faster when grain is larger. When D>40 μm, crack propagates slower when grain is larger. According to the fractographic features, corrosion fatigue mechanism is anodic dissolution under fine grain condition but hydrogen embrittlement under coarse grain condition.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 362: Symposium J – Grain-Size and Mechanical Properties--Fundamentals and Applications , 1994 , 199
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lindigkeit, J., et al., Acta, Meta, (1979)Google Scholar
2. Lesser, J. E., et al, Met. Trans., 7, (1976)Google Scholar
3. Lin, D., et al, Met. Trans, 1988 Google Scholar
4. Yang, Z., et al, J. of Chinese Corrosion and Protection, 9, (1987)Google Scholar
5. Mcdarmaid, D. S., Met. Tech, 1, (1988)Google Scholar
6. Xing, Z., Ph.D thesis, Xi'an Jiaoton University, (1988)Google Scholar
7. Briant, C. L., et al. Met. Trans. 827, (1982)Google Scholar
8. Clayton, J. Q., et al, Met. Sci., 145, (1982)Google Scholar
9. Martine, M., Mater. Sci. Tech. 6, (1985)Google Scholar
10. Song, Y., Relationship Between Boundaries and Strengh of Metals, Xi'an Jiaotong University Press,Google Scholar
11. Rath, B. B., et al., Met. Trans, 10, (1971)Google Scholar
12. Scriniuas, M., et al., Scripta Meta. (1986)Google Scholar
13. Materials, 27, 59, (1978)Google Scholar