Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T00:08:58.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Surface Layers on the Dissolution of Nuclear Waste Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Shi-Ben Xing ,
Andrew C. Buechele  and
Ian L. Pegg
Shi-Ben Xing
Affiliation:
Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064
Andrew C. Buechele
Affiliation:
Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064
Ian L. Pegg
Affiliation:
Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064
Get access

Abstract

Explanation of the striking non-linear effect of glass composition on the aqueous dissolution represents an important challenge to existing dissolution mechanisms. Surface layers that are formed during glass dissolution may play an important role in this effect. One chemically reactive and one less-reactive nuclear waste glass (leachate concentrations differ by about a factor of 10) were reacted in deionized water. Two types of glass powders were used: Type A powders were pristine glass powders; Type B powders were the glass powders which had been reacted for 120 days to develop the surface layers. Both the solution concentrations and the surface layers were investigated. The experimental observations indicate that: (i) There is a range of glass compositions over which small differences in composition lead to large changes in both reaction rates and surface layer thickness; and (ii) The reaction rate is strongly affected by the formation of the surface layer (the layer appears to be protective) and cannot be explained in terms of saturation effects alone. The findings are contrary to the conclusion of a previous study and serve to highlight the inadequacy of existing dissolution models predicated on an overly simplistic mechanism, especially with regard to glass composition effects.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 333: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVII , 1993 , 541
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Hench, L.L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 125, 189, (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Adams, P.B., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 125, 115, (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 White, W.B., “Advances in Ceramics”, Vol. 20, Nuclear Waste Management II, Amer. Cer. Soc., p. 431, (1987).Google Scholar
4 Doremus, R.H., Mehrotra, Y., Lanford, W.A., and Burman, C., J. Mat. Sci., 18, 612, (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Hench, L.L. and Clark, D.E., J. Non-Cryst. Sol., 28, 83, (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Bates, J.K., Ebert, W.L., Mazer, J.J., Bradley, J.P., and Dietz, N.L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 212, 77, (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Bunker, B.C., Arnold, G.W., Day, D.E., and Bray, P.J., J. Non-Cryst. Sol., 87, 226, (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Mendel, J.E., “Final Report of the Defence High-Level Waste Leaching Mechanism Program”, Pacific Northwest Laboratory Report, PNL-5157, (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Chick, L.A. and Pederson, L.R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 26, 635, (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Grambow, B., and Strachan, D.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 26, 623–634, (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Conradt, R., Roggendorf, H. and Scholze, H., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 50, 203–210, (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Grambow, B., “Nuclear Waste Glass Dissolution: Mechanism, Model, and Application”, JSS Project Technical Report 87-02, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. (1987).Google Scholar
13 Bourcier, W.L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176, 3–18, (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Bourcier, W.L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 212, 3 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Bourcier, W.L., Ebert, W.L., and Feng, X., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 294, 577 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Advocat, T., Crovisier, J.L., Fritz, B., and Vernaz, E., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 176, 241 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Feng, X., Pegg, I.L., Barkatt, Aa., Macedo, P.B., Cucinell, S., and Lai, S., Nucl. Technol., 85, 334 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Muller, I.S., Buechele, A.C., Pegg, I.L., and Macedo, P.B., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 257, 91, (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Jantzen, C.M., and Bibler, N.E., “Product Consistency Test (PCT) Method-Version 3.0”,WSRC-TR-90-539, Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Aiken, South Carolina, USA, (1989).Google Scholar
20 Bunker, B.C., Tallant, D.R., Headley, T.J., Turner, G.L., and Kirkpatrick, R.J., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 29, 106–120, (1988).Google Scholar