Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:46:05.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects Of Ar+ Ion Bombardment on the Nucleation and Growth of Ag Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

C.M. Cotell
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Code 4672, Washington, D.C. 20375–5000
J.A. Sprague
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Code 4672, Washington, D.C. 20375–5000
C.R. Gossett
Affiliation:
Sachs-Freeman Associates, Landover, MD 20785
Get access

Abstract

Thin films of Ag were grown on amorphous C and <111= Si substrates with simultaneous Ar+ bombardment at energies ranging from 50–40,000 eV. For deposition of Ag on amorphous C, ion beam bombardment induced no changes in film nucleation behavior relative to evaporation (henceforth referred to as physical vapor deposition, PVD). Film growth was affected at the highest energy (40 keV); the grain size of the Ag films was increased by a factor of three. Rutherford Backscattering (RBS) measurements on Ag films on <111=Si bombarded with Ar+ at 1.5 keV showed that the Ag sputtering yield at film thicknesses <1.5 nm was less than for bulk Ag, in agreement with TRIM calculations. At 40 keV there was evidence for an additional effect of the ion beam due to recoil implantation or ion mixing. Electron diffraction from Ag fdms grown on <111= Si substrates with simultaneous Ar+ bombardment at either 1.5 keV or 40 keV showed evidence for only the expected phases: single crystal Si, polycrystalline Ag, and an amorphous phase that likely resulted from ion damage to the substrate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Marmov, M., Thin Solid Films 46, 267 (1977).Google Scholar
2. Chambers, G.P. and Sartwell, B.D., Surface Science 218, 55 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Kant, R.A. and Sartwell, B.D., Mater. Sci. and Engin. 90, 357 (1987).Google Scholar
4. VanVechten, D., Hubler, G.K., Donovan, E.P., and Correll, F.D., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A8, 821 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Matsunami, N., Yamamura, Y., Itikawa, Y., Itoh, N., Kazumata, Y., Miyagawa, S., Morita, K., Shimizu, R., and Tawara, H., Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 31, 1 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Ziegler, J.F., Biersack, J.P., and Littmark, U., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids. (Pergamon, New York 1985).Google Scholar
7. Tognetti, N.P., Webb, R.P., Christodoulides, C.E., Armour, D.G., and Carter, G., Nucl. Inst, and Meth. 182/183, 107 (1981).Google Scholar