Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T22:19:48.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Gas Composition and Pressure on RF Plasma Sintering of MgO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Peter C. Kong
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Mennesota, U.S.A.
Y. C. Lau
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Mennesota, U.S.A.
E. Pfender
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Mennesota, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Rapid densification of MgO in an rf plasma without sintering aids is demonstrated. The sintered densities of MgO are sensitive to the plasma composition and gas pressure. In general, specimens are sintered to higher densities in Ar/O2 and Ar/H2O plasmas than in pure Ar plasmas. This may be explained by the effects of plasma enthalpy and surface recombination of charged particles and of atomic species. Analyses show that the evolution of the microstructures of the sintered specimens remains similar, regardless of the plasma conditions. No substantial grain growth is observed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bennett, C.E.G., Mckinnon, N.A., and Williams, L.S., Nature, 217. 1287–88 (1968).Google Scholar
2. Bennett, C.E.G. and Mckinnon, N.A., in Kinetics of Reactions in Ionic Systems, edited by Gray, T.J. and Frechette, V.D. (Plenum Press, New York, 1969) pp. 408412.Google Scholar
3. Cordone, L.G. and Martinsen, W.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 55[71], 380 (1975).Google Scholar
4. Thomas, G., Freim, J., and Martinsen, W.E., Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 17. 177 (1973).Google Scholar
5. Thomas, G. and Freim, J., Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 21, 182–3 (1975).Google Scholar
6. Johnson, D.L. and Rizzo, R.A., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 59[4]. 467–72 (1980).Google Scholar
7. Johnson, D.L. and Kim, J.S., in Sintering - Theory and Practice. Material Science Monographs: Vol.14 edited by Kolar, D., Pejovnik, S., and Ristic, M.M. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1982) pp. 573–78.Google Scholar
8. Johnson, D.L., Kramb, V.A. and Lynch, D.C., in Emergent Process Methods for High-Technology Ceramics: Material Science Research. Vol.17, edited by Davis, R.F., Palmour, H. III, and Porter, R.L., (Plenum Press, New York, 1982) pp. 207211.Google Scholar
9. Kim, J.S. and Johnson, D.L., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 62. 620622 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Johnson, D.J., Sanderson, W.B., Knowlton, J.M., and Kemer, E.L., Proc. of MgO/Al2O3 Conf., M.I.T., Cambridge, MA, 1983.Google Scholar
11. Kijima, K., Proc. of the 59th Annual Meeting of Ceramic Society of Japan, Japan, 1984, pg. 555.Google Scholar
12. Kijima, K., 7th Int. Symp. on Plasma Chemistry, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, July 1985, pp. 662667.Google Scholar
13. Pfender, E. and Lee, Y.C., in Plasma Processing and Synthesis of Materials, MRS Symp. Proc.. Vol.30; edited by Szekely, J. and Apelian, D., (North-Holland, New York, 1984) pp. 141150.Google Scholar