Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:58:26.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Rapid Thermal Annealing on Heavily Boron Doped Silicon Epitaxial Layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Jianbao Wang
Affiliation:
Fudan T. D. Lee Physics Laboratory, Fudan University, Shanghai, CHINA
Qiang Xu
Affiliation:
Fudan T. D. Lee Physics Laboratory, Fudan University, Shanghai, CHINA
Fang Lu
Affiliation:
Fudan T. D. Lee Physics Laboratory, Fudan University, Shanghai, CHINA
Henghui Sun
Affiliation:
Fudan T. D. Lee Physics Laboratory, Fudan University, Shanghai, CHINA
Xun Wang
Affiliation:
Fudan T. D. Lee Physics Laboratory, Fudan University, Shanghai, CHINA
Get access

Abstract

The effects of rapid thermal annealing (RTA) on the electrical properties and the strain relaxation of the heavily boron doped silicon layers grown by molecular beam epitaxy have been studied by Hall effect measurements and double crystal x-ray diffraction. After the RTA treatment at temperatures above 1000°C, the increases of both carrier concentration and Hall mobility as well as the improvement of crystalline quality of epitaxial layers are acheived. It is verified that the lattice mismatch between the epitaxial layer and the Si substrate is proportional to the concentration of the substitutional boron rather than the total boron concentration. The lattice contraction coefficient ² is determined to be 5.3 (in units 10-24cm3) in the carrier concentration range of 0.75∼ 3×1020cnr-3.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Larson, B.C., While, C.W. and Appleton, B.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 32, 801 (1978).Google Scholar
2. Yukota, J., J Phys. Soc. Jpn. 19, 1487 (1964).Google Scholar
3. Baribeau, J.M. and Rolfe, S.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2129 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Jackman, T.E., Houghton, D.C., Jackman, J.A., Denhoff, M.W., Kechang, S., McCaffrey, J., and Rockett, A., J. Appl. Phys. 66, 1984 (1989)Google Scholar
5. Brown, G.T., Barnett, S.J., Blackmore, G.W., Courtney, S.J., and Houghton, D.C., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 102, 289 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Xu, Q., Yuan, J., Wang, J.B., Huang, D.M., Lu, F., Sun, H.H., Wang, X., and Liu, R., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 1697 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Cargill, G.S. III, Angilello, J., and Kavanagh, K.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1748 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Horn, F.H., Phys. Rev. 97, 1521 (1955).Google Scholar
9. McQuhae, K.G. and Brown, A.S., Solid-State Electron. 15, 259 (1972).Google Scholar
10. Herzog, H.J., sepregi, L.C., and Seidel, H., J. Electrochem. Soc. 131, 2969 (1984).Google Scholar