Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T19:57:42.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrodeposition of CIGS on Metal Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

A. Kampmann
Affiliation:
CIS Solartechnik GmbH, c/o Norddeutsche Affinerie, Hovestr. 50, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany
J. Rechid
Affiliation:
CIS Solartechnik GmbH, c/o Norddeutsche Affinerie, Hovestr. 50, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany
A. Raitzig
Affiliation:
CIS Solartechnik GmbH, c/o Norddeutsche Affinerie, Hovestr. 50, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany
S. Wulff
Affiliation:
CIS Solartechnik GmbH, c/o Norddeutsche Affinerie, Hovestr. 50, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany
M. Mihhailova
Affiliation:
CIS Solartechnik GmbH, c/o Norddeutsche Affinerie, Hovestr. 50, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany
R. Thyen
Affiliation:
CIS Solartechnik GmbH, c/o Norddeutsche Affinerie, Hovestr. 50, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany
K. Kalberlah
Affiliation:
CIS Solartechnik GmbH, c/o Norddeutsche Affinerie, Hovestr. 50, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The development of a low cost roll-to-roll production process for CIGS remains an attractive goal. In the present approach, the absorber is prepared by electrodeposition techniques, while molybdenum, copper or stainless steel (SS) are used as flexible substrates. Two electrodeposition routes are evaluated: sequential plating of Cu, In and Ga followed by Se evaporation is compared to simultaneous (= ternary) electrodeposition of Cu, In and Se. Ternary electrodeposition yields 7.5 % efficiency on stainless steel. The sequential process leads to 9.0 % cell efficiency on copper and on stainless steel substrates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Kessler, F. et al., Proceedings of the 16th European PVSEC, Glasgow (2000) pp. 317320.Google Scholar
[2] Hartmann, M. et al., Proceedings of 28th IEEE PVSC (2000) pp. 638641.Google Scholar
[3] Wiedemann, S. et al., Proceedings of 29th IEEE PVSC, New Orleans (2002).Google Scholar
[4] Herz, K. et al., Thin Solid Films 403-404, 384 (2002).Google Scholar
[5] Satoh, T. et al., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 75, 65 (2003).Google Scholar
[6] Contreras, M. A. et al., Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 7, 311 (1999).Google Scholar
[7] Kapur, V. et al. Solar Cells 21, 65 (1987).Google Scholar
[8] Guimard, D. et al., Proceedings of 29th IEEE PVSC, New Orleans (2002).Google Scholar
[9] Rechid, J. et al., Proceedings of the 3rd WC on PVSEC, Osaka (2003).Google Scholar