Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T04:36:16.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Erosion of a Silicon Carbide Whisker Reinforced Silicon Nitride

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

C. T. Morrison
Affiliation:
Dept of Materials Engr., North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695
J. L. Routbort
Affiliation:
Matl. Science Div, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
R. O. Scatitergood
Affiliation:
Dept of Materials Engr., North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695
Get access

Abstract

The steady-state solid particle erosion behavior of hot-pressed Si3N4 reinforced with 0, 10, and 20 weight percent SiC whiskers has been investigated at room temperature using angular alumina particles (63 to 270 μm diameter) as the erodent. The impact angle was varied from 30 to 90 ° and particle velocities were varied from 80 to 140 m/s. These materials were found to be very erosion resistant. However, there was little effect of the SiC whisker reinforcement on either the absolute erosion rate or on the velocity or particle-size exponents for the rates.The lack of a fiber reinforcement effect occurs even though the fiber additions provide an increase in the fracture toughness at high fiber contents. Results on differently processed Si3Na4 .base materials showed that microstructural variations due to processing history have very significant influence on the erosion resistance of the base (matrix) material. The results substantiate the idea that microstructure plays an important, but not fully understood role in the erosion processes for brittle materials.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

[1] Rice, R. W., Cer. Eng. Sci. Proc. 2, 661 (1981).Google Scholar
[2] Shalek, P.D., Petrovic, J.J., Hurley, G.F. and Gac, F.D., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 65, 351 (1986).Google Scholar
[3] Sykes, M.T., Scattergood, R.O. and Routbort, J.L., Composites, in press.Google Scholar
[4] Singh, J.P., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
[5] Kosel, T.H., Scattergood, R.O. and Turner, A.P.L., in Wear of Materials, edited by K. C., Ludema, W.A., Glaeser and S.K., Rhee (ASME, New York, 1979) p. 192.Google Scholar
[6] Routbort, J.L., Scattergood, R.O. and Turner, A.P.L., Wear 59, 363 (1980).Google Scholar
[7] Routbort, J.L., Scattergood, R.O. and Kay, E.W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 63, 635 (1980).Google Scholar
[8] Morrison, C. T., Routbort, J.L. and Scattergood, R.O., Wear 105, 19 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Hockey, B.J., Wiederhorn, S.M. and Johnson, H., in Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, edited by R.C., Bradt, D.P.H., Hasselman and F.F., Lange (Plenum Press, New York, 1977) p. 379.Google Scholar
[10] Evans, A.G., Gulden, M.E. and Rosenblatt, M., Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 361, 343 (1978).Google Scholar
[11] Wiederhorn, S.M. and Lawn, B.R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 62, 66 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Singh, J.P., Goretta, K.C., Routbort, J.L. and Rhodes, J.F., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
[13] Wiederhorn, S.M. and Hockey, B.J., J. Mat. Sci. 18, 766 (1983).Google Scholar
[14] Routbort, J.L. and Scattergood, R.O., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 63, 593 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Routbort, J.L. and Matzke, Hj., J. of Matl. Science 18, 1491 (1983).Google Scholar
[16] Ritter, J.E., Matl. Science and Engr. 71, 195 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Srinivasan, S. and Scattergood, R.O., J. of Matd. Science, in pressGoogle Scholar
[18] Tilly, G.P. and Sage, W., Wear 11, 123 (1968).Google Scholar