Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T00:16:10.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation Mechanism and Recombination-Enhanced Dissociation of a Hydrogen-Carbon Complex in Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Yoichi Kamiura
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Okayama University, Tsushitnanaka 3–1–1, Okayama 700, Japan
Fumio Hashimoto
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Okayama University, Tsushitnanaka 3–1–1, Okayama 700, Japan
Minoru Yoneta
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Okayama University of Science, Ridaichou 1–1, Okayama 700, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Wc have found that chemical etching induced an electron trap E3 (0.15) into n-typc Si. We attribute this trap to a hydrogen-carbon complex on the basis of available experimental data. By measuring DLTS depth profiles of the E3 trap, we propose a model of the formation mechanism of the hydrogen-carbon complex as follows. Hydrogen atoms arc adsorbed on the Si surface to terminate Si dangling bonds during chemical etching, and after the etching some unstably adsorbed ones diffuse into the near-surface region of silicon and are trapped by carbon to form the complex. The E3 trap is stable up to 100δC in the dark but is annihilated by the illumination of band gap light around 250K only outside the depletion layer of the Schottky structure. This provides unambiguous experimental evidence for the recombination-enhanced dissociation, in which the electronic energy released by the electron-hole recombination at the E3 level is converted into local kinetic energy of hydrogen to be released from carbon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pearton, S. J., Corbett, J. W., and Shi, T. S., Appl. Phys. A 43, 153 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Chevallier, J. and Aucouturier, M., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. L8, 219 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Pearton, S. J., Stavola, M., and Corbett, J. W., Mater, Sci. Forum 38–41, 25 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Trucks, G. W., Raghavachari, K., Higashi, G. S., and Chabal, Y. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 504 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Yoncta, M., Kamiura, Y., and Hashimoto, F., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 1295 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Kamiura, Y., Yoneta, M., and Hashimoto, F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 3165 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Van Wieringen, A. and Warmoltz, N., Physica 22, 849 (1956).Google Scholar
8. Aurei, F. D., Kleinhenz, R., and Schneider, C. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 14, 209 (1984) 1.Google Scholar
9. Ohta, E., Kakishita, K., Lee, H. Y., Sato, T., and Sakata, M., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 3928 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Endrös, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 70 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Seager, C. H. and Anderson, R. A., Solid State Commun, 76, 285 (1990).Google Scholar