Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:00:08.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fracture Behavior of Thin Film PZT on Silicon Mems and Membranes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

A. L. Olson
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
J. L. Skinner
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
D. F. Bahr
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
C. D. Richards
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
R. F. Richards
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Get access

Abstract

This research focuses on identifying the fracture mechanism in thin film silicon membranes and PZT on silicon composite structures under static and dynamic loading conditions. Square silicon membranes with a 3mm side-length and thickness between 1.5 and 3.0μm, with and without 1.5μm of PZT, were pressurized to failure while laser interferometry was used to determine the maximum strain at failure. The strain at fracture of silicon membranes, initiating from the sharp corner radius inside the micromachined cavity, was improved from 0.37% to 0.8% by an isotropic etch of the sharp corner. Fracture of PZT on silicon membranes, tested at the mechanical resonant frequency suggested that fracture initiates in the blanket PZT layers under reversed bending. Etching the PZT from high strain regions along the membrane surface improved the strain at failure of the composite device by 40%.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Namazu, T., Isono, Y., Tanaka, T., J. MEMS 9, 450(2000).Google Scholar
2. Wilson, C., Beck, P., J. MEMS 5, 142 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Bromley, S., Howell, L., Jensen, B., Eng. Failure Analysis 6, 27 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Petersen, K., Proceedings of The IEEE, 70, 420 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Bahr, D.F., Bruce, K.R., Olson, B.W., Eakins, L.M., Richards, C.D., and Richards, R.F., Proceedings of the Materials Research Society, 687, 4.3.1 (2002).Google Scholar
6. Kovacs, G., Micromachined Transducers Sourcebook, McGraw-Hill, New York (1998).Google Scholar
7. Hall, J.D., Apperson, N.E., Crozier, B.T., Xu, C., Richards, R.F., Bahr, D.F., and Richards, C.D., Review of Scientific Instrumentation, 73, 2067 (2002).Google Scholar
8. Vlassak, J.J., Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 7, 3242 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Hohlfelder, Robert J., Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University (1999).Google Scholar