Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T05:01:07.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High Temperature Infrared Photon Detector Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

C. H. Grein
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, M/C 273, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 W. Taylor St. #2236, Chicago IL 60607-7059
H. Ehrenreich
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Get access

Abstract

The combined effects of suppressing Auger recombination by band structure engineering strained-layer superlattices (SL), suppressing radiative recombination by photon recycling, and suppressing both Auger and radiative recombination with carrier depletion are calculated quantitatively for long-wavelength and mid-wavelength InAs/ InxGa1-xSb SL-based infrared detectors operating at temperatures between 200 and 300K. The results are compared to their HgCdTe counterparts. The SL performance is better in all cases. However, the carrier concentrations required for typical background limited performance (300K, 2π field of view), ranging between about 1 × 1013 and 4 × 1013 cm−3 at 300K in long-wavelength to mid-wavelength SLs, are seen to be impractically low. The carrier concentration in a 11 μm photon detector yielding equivalent performance to an ideal 300K thermal detector is about 1014 cm−3. Large performance enhancement using carrier depletion therefore appears impractical even in optimized SLs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Grein, C.H., Young, P.M., Flatté, M.E., and Ehrenreich, H., J. Appl. Phys. 78, p. 7143 (1995).Google Scholar
[2] Dumke, W.P., Phys. Rev. 105, p. 139 (1957).Google Scholar
[3] Grein, C.H., Ehrenreich, H., and Runge, E., SPIE Proceedings 2999, p. 18 (1997); C.H. Grein, E. Runge, and H. Ehrenreich, in preparation.Google Scholar
[4] Ashley, T., Elliott, C.T., and Harker, A.T., Infrared Physics 26, p. 303 (1986).Google Scholar
[5] Piotrowski, J., Gawron, W., and Djuric, Z., Optical Engineering 33, p. 1413 (1994).Google Scholar
[6] Youngdale, E.R., Meyer, J.R., Hoffman, C.A., Bartoli, F.J., Crein, C.H., Young, P.M., Ehrenreich, H., Miles, R.H., and Chow, D.H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, p. 3160 (1994).Google Scholar
[7] Humphreys, R.G., Infrared Phys. 23, p. 171 (1983).Google Scholar
[8] van Roosbroeck, W. and Shockley, W., Phys. Rev. 94, p. 1558 (1954).Google Scholar
[9] Elliott, C.T., Gordon, N.T., Hall, R.S., Phillips, T.J., White, A.M., Jones, C.L., Maxey, C.D., and Metcalfe, N.E., J. Elect. Mater. 25, p. 1139 (1996).Google Scholar
[10] Kinch, M.A. and Borrello, S.R., Infrared Physics 15, p. 111 (1975).Google Scholar
[11] Rose, A., Concepts in Photoconductivity and Allied Problems (Interscience, New York, 1963).Google Scholar
[12] Johnson, N.F., Ehrenreich, H., Hui, P.M., and Young, P.M., Phys. Rev. B 41, p. 3655 (1990).Google Scholar
[13] Williams, G.M., J. Appl. Phys. 77, p. 4153 (1995).Google Scholar
[14] Crein, C.H., Flatté, M.E., Ehrenreich, H., and Miles, R.H., J. Appl. Phys. 77, p. 4156 (1995).Google Scholar
[15] Juan, Y., private communication.Google Scholar
[16] Young, P., private communication.Google Scholar
[17] The Infrared Handbook, edited by Wolfe, W.L. and Zissls, G.J., p. 1129 (Office of Naval Research, Washington, 1978).Google Scholar