Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:50:47.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hillock Formation in Tensile Loaded Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Karen E. Harris
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2275.
Alexander H. King
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2275.
Get access

Abstract

While hillocks usually form to relieve compressive stresses in thin films resulting from electromigration or a difference in thermal expansion in the film and substrate, we have observed hillock formation in tensile-loaded films. We have used transmission electron microscopy to study hillocks which formed in free-standing gold thin films of 25nm nominal thickness. Grain growth during 150°C anneals reduced the grain boundary area and associated free volume, placing the films under tensile stress. While hillock formation could only increase this stress, large single crystal or polycrystalline hillocks with thicknesses up to three times the film thickness are observed after 400°C annealing, after long room temperature anneals, and during TEM observation. These observations suggest the operation of a hillock formation mechanism not explained by any existing hillock formation theories.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Harris, K. E. and King, A. H., J. Elec. Mater. 23, 1035 (1994).Google Scholar
2 NIH Image is a public domain image analysis program for Macintosh computers; it is available via internet from the FTP site zippy.nimh.nih.gov, in the directory /pub/nih-image.Google Scholar
3 Chaudhari, P., J. Appl. Phys. 45, 4339 (1974).Google Scholar
4 Harris, K. E. and King, A. H. in Thin Films, Stresses and Mechanical Properties V (Pittsburgh, PA: Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.) in press.Google Scholar
5 M, Ronay and Aliotta, C. F., Phil Mag A 42, 161 ( 1980).Google Scholar
6 Pico, C. A., and Bonifield, T. D., J. Mater. Res., 8, 1001 (1993).Google Scholar
7 Pico, C. A., and Bonifield, T. D., J. Mater. Res., 8, 1010 (1993).Google Scholar
8 Pennebaker, W. B., J. Appl. Phys. 40, 394 (1969).Google Scholar
9 Schwarzer, R. A. and Gerth, D., J. Elec. Mater. 22, 607 (1993).Google Scholar
10 Bacconnier, B., Lormand, G., Papapietro, M., Achard, M., Papon, A.-M., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 6483 (1988).Google Scholar
11 Srolovitz, D. J., Acta metall. 37, 621 (1989).Google Scholar
12 Washburn, J. and E, Parker, J. of Metals 4, 1076 ( 1952).Google Scholar