Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T07:51:15.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Humic Substances in Ground Waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

N. Paxéus
Affiliation:
Department of Analytical and Marine Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Göteborg, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
B. Allard
Affiliation:
Department of Water in Environment and Society, University of Linköping, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden
U. Olofsson
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
M. Bengtsson
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

The humic materials isolated from ground waters of a borehole in Fjällveden (Sweden) were characterized by elemental and functional group analyses. Spectroscopic properties, molecular weight distributions as well as acid-base properties of the fulvic and humic fractions were also studied. The ground water humic substances were found to be quite similar in many respects (but not identical) to the Swedish surface water humics concentrated from the Gτ(b, A)öta River but appeared to be quite different from the American ground water humics from Biscayne Florida Aquifer or Laramie Fox-Hills in Colorado. The physico-chemical properties of the isolated humic materials are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Stevenson, F.J., Soil Sci. 123, 10 (1977).Google Scholar
2. Shuman, M.S. and Cromer, J.L., Environ. Sci. Technol. 13, 543 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Buffle, J., Deladoey, P., Greter, F.L. and Haerdi, W., Anal. Chim. Acta 116, 255 (1980).Google Scholar
4. Saar, R.A. and Weber, J.H., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 44, 1381 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Templeton, G.D. and Chasteen, N.D., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 44, 741 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Frimmel, F.H. and Geywitz, J., Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem. 316, 582 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Bertha, E.L. and Choppin, G.R., J. inorg. nucl. chem. 40, 655 (1978).Google Scholar
8. Ruggiero, P., Attimonelli, M., Intresse, F.S. and Sciacovelli, O., Agrochim. 23 37 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Arai, S. and Kumada, K., Geoderma 26, 1 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Choppin, G.R. and Allard, B., in Handbook of the physics and chemistry of the actinides, edited by Freeman, A., Landers, J. and Keller, C. (North Holland Publ. Comp., Amsterdam, 1984).Google Scholar
11. Langford, C.H., Kay, R., Quance, G.W. and Khan, T.R., Anal. Lett. 10, 1249 (1977).Google Scholar
12. Schnitzer, M., in Soil organic matter, edited by Schnitzer, M. and Khan, S.U. (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1978), p. 52.Google Scholar
13. Stevenson, F.J., Humus Chemistry, (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1982), p. 427.Google Scholar
14. Leenheer, J.A., Malcolm, R.L., McKinley, P.W. and Eccles, L.A., J. Res. US Geol. Surv. 2, 361 (1974).Google Scholar
15. Reuter, J.H. and Perdue, E.M., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 41 325 (1977).Google Scholar
16. Thurman, E.M. and Malcolm, R.L., Envir. Sci. Technol. 1981, 463.Google Scholar
17. Allard, B., Larson, S.Å., Tullborg, E.-L. and Wikner, P., KBS Technical Report 83–59, Swedish Nuclear Fuel Supply Co./Division KBS, Stockholm, 1983.Google Scholar
18. Paxéus, N., PhD. Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Göteborg, Sweden, 1985.Google Scholar
19. Ghosh, K. and Schnitzer, M., Soil Sci., 129, 226 (1980).Google Scholar
20. Reuter, J.H. and Perdue, E.M., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 45, 2017 (1981).Google Scholar
21. Calderoni, G. and Schnitzer, M., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48, 2045 (1984).Google Scholar
22. Paxéus, N. and Wedborg, M., Anal. Chim. Acta, 169, 88 (1985).Google Scholar