Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T10:10:32.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Situ Study of Isothermal Strain Relaxation in Si-Ge Heteroepitaxial Films Using Substrate Curvature Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Véronique T. Gillard ,
David B. Noble  and
William D. Nix
Véronique T. Gillard
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
David B. Noble
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
William D. Nix
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Get access

Abstract

Understanding die kinetics and mechanisms of strain relaxation in Si-Ge heteroepitaxial films is pertinent to several device applications. In this paper we present a method for determining the evolution of the mobile dislocation density with time during the course of strain relaxation taking place in an isothermal annealing experiment.

Wafer curvature measurements using a laser scanning technique are used to determine the elastic strain after growth in films of variable thickness and to follow the strain relaxation during isothermal annealing experiments. By coupling the strain relaxation measurements with previous TEM measurements of dislocation velocities in this system, the mobile threading dislocation density and its evolution with time are determined.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 239: Symposium D – Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties III , 1991 , 395
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nix, W. D., Noble, D. B., and Turlo, J. F. in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties II. edited by Doerner, M. F., Oliver, W. C., Pharr, G. M., and Brotzen, F. R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 188, Pittsburgh, PA 1990) pp. 315–330.Google Scholar
2. People, R., Physical Review, B 32, 1405 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Fitzgerald, E. A., Xie, Y.-H., Green, M. L., Brašen, D., Kortan, A. R., Michel, J., Mii, Y.-J., and Weir, B. E., Appl. Phys. Lett., 59 (7), 811, (1991).Google Scholar
4. von Preissig, F. J., PhD. Dissertation, Stanford University (1991).Google Scholar
5. Alexander, H. and Hassen, P., Solid State Physics, 22, 27 (1968).Google Scholar
6. Hagen, W. and Strunk, H., Appl. Phys., 12, 85 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Olesinski, R. and Abbaschian, G., Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams, 5 (2), 180 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Touloukian, Y., Kirby, R., Taylor, R., and Desai, P. in Thermophvsical Properties of Matter: Metallic Elements and Alloys. (IFI/Plenum, 12, New York, 1975) pp. 116–119.Google Scholar
9. Touloukian, Y., Kirby, R., Taylor, R., and Lee, T. in Thermophvsical Properties of Matter: Nonmetallic Solids. (IFI/Plenum, 13, New York, 1977) pp. 154–157.Google Scholar
10. Imai, M. and Sumino, K., Phil. Mag., 47A. 599 (1983).Google Scholar