Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T11:43:08.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Diffusion and Convective Transport on Dendritic Growth in Dilute Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M. E. Glicksman
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
Narsingh Bahadur Singh
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
M. Chopra
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
Get access

Abstract

Extensive experimentation has been carried out in which the kinetics and morphology of dendritic growth were measured as a function of thermal supercooling, solute concentration, and spatial orientation of the dendritic growth axis. The crystal growth system studied is succinonitrile [NC(CH2)2CN] with additions of argon (up to 0.1 mole %). This system is especially useful as a model for alloy studies because kinetic data are available for high purity (7–9's) succinonitrile. The addition of argon provides a simple, controllable dilute solute that now permits the first comparably detailed dendritic growth studies on binary alloys.

One dramatic influence of the solute, at fixed thermal supercooling, is to increase the growth velocity (to a maximum) and correspondingly decrease intrinsic crystal dimensions (tip radius). Morphological measurements will be described in detail relating tip size, perturbation wavelength, supercooling, and solute concentration. The analysis of these effects based on morphological stability theory will also be discussed. Finally, experiments permitting the separation of convective and diffusive heat transport during crystal growth of succinonitrile will be described briefly. These studies clearly underscore the importance of gravitationally-induced buoyancy effects on crystal growth kinetics and morphology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Glicksman, M. E., Schaefer, R. J. and Ayers, J. D., Met. Trans. 7A (1976), 1747.Google Scholar
2.Trivedi, R., J. Cryst. Growth 48, (1980), 9399.Google Scholar
3.Huang, S. C. and Glicksman, M. E., Acta Met. 29, (1931), 701.Google Scholar
4.Huang, S. C. and Glicksman, M. E., Acta Met. 29, (1981), 717.Google Scholar
5.Mullins, W. W. and Sekerka, R. F., J. Appl. Phys. 43(2), (1963), 323.Google Scholar
6.Langer, J. S. and Müller-Krumbhaar, H., Acta Met. 26, (1978), 1697.Google Scholar
7.Langer, J. S. and Müller-Krumbhaar, H., Acta Met. 26, (1978), 1681.Google Scholar
8.Langer, J. S., Sekerka, R. F. and Fujioka, T., J. Crystal Growth 14, (1978), 414.Google Scholar
9.Ivantsov, G. P., Dokl. Akad. Nauk, USSR 58, (1947), 561.Google Scholar
10.Temkin, D. E., Dokl. Akad. Nauk, USSR 132, (1969), 1307.Google Scholar
11.Langer, J. S., Physico Chemical Hydrodynamics 1, (1981).Google Scholar
12.Coriell, S. R., Washington, N.B.S., D.C. (private communication).Google Scholar
13.Longuet-Higgins, H. C. and Pope, J. A., J. Chem. Phys. 25, (1956), 884.Google Scholar
14.Einstein, A., Ann. Physik 17, (1905), 549.Google Scholar
15.Eyring, H., J. Chem. Phys. 4, (1936), 283.Google Scholar
16.Chang, P. and Wilke, C. R., J. Phys. Chem. 59, (1955), 592.Google Scholar
17.Ree, T. S., Ree, T., and Eyring, H., J. Phys. Chem. 68, (1964), 3262.Google Scholar
18.Wise, D. L. and Houghton, G., Chem. Eng. Sci. 21, (1966), 999.Google Scholar
19.Glicksman, M. E. and Huang, S. C., Proc. of 3rd European Symp. on Material Sciences in Space, Grenoble, April 24–27, 1979; ESA SP–142 (June 1979).Google Scholar