Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T10:54:14.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intercalation-Desorption Studies of Graphite Nitrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

T. Dziemianowicz ,
K. Leong  and
W.C. Forsman
T. Dziemianowicz
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104
K. Leong
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104
W.C. Forsman
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access

Abstract

A new model for intercalation kinetics is presented whick takes into account both nucleation of the interlaminar spaces and intercalant layer growth. For nitric acid intercalation, the nucleation constant, β, ranges from 1.25×10−3 to 10−4 sec−1 depending on graphite type (HOPG > powder > fibers); the corresponding range of effective diffusivities, D, is 2.5×10−5 to 10−10 cm2/sec. It is emphasized that effective diffusivities obtained from sorption kinetics are reaction enhanced.

Stepwise isothermal desorption experiments show that the diffusivities of HNO3 neutrals are lower than the effective diffusivities on sorption. At desorptive equilibrium, intercalant retention is in the order HOPG > fibers > powder. In HOPG, resistance is constant over the desorptive transition stage II → III → IV; during the stage IV → V → VI regime (dynamic vacuum), resistance doubles. A similar resistance gain is noted on desorption of neturals from nitrated graphite fibers.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 20: Symposium H – Intercalated Graphite , 1982 , 277
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rüdorff, W., Z. Phys. Chem. B, 45, 42 (1939).Google Scholar
2. Forsman, W. C., Vogel, F. L., Carl, D. E., and Hoffman, J., Carbon 16, 269 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Nixon, D. E., Parry, G. S., and Ubbelohde, A. R., Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 291, 324 (1966).Google Scholar
4. Fischer, J. E., “Electronic Properties of Graphite Intercalation Compounds,” Vol. 6, “Intercalated Layered Materials,” Levy, F., ed., Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Forsman, W. C., Vogel, F. L., and Carl, D. E., Mat. Sci. Eng., 47, 187 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Perry, R. H., and Chilton, C. H., eds., “Chemical Engineers' Handbook,” 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, 1973, p. 3–66.Google Scholar
7. Zeller, C., Foley, G. M., Falardeau, E. R., and Vogel, F. L., Mat. Sci. Eng. 31, 255 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Vogel, F. L., Fourth London Int'l. Conf. on Carbon and Graphite, 332 (1974).Google Scholar
9. Dowell, M., Ext. Abs. Prog., 13th Bienn. Conf. Carbon, 11 (1977).Google Scholar
10. Dowell, M., Mat. Sci. Eng., 31, 129 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Barker, J. A. and Croft., R. C., Aust. J. Chem., 6, 302 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Bardhan, K. K. and Chung, D.D.L., Ext. Abs. Prog., 14th Bienn. Conf. Carbon282(1979).Google Scholar
13. Metz, W. and Siemsgluss, L., Mat. Sci. Eng., 31, 119 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Crank, J., “The Mathematics of Diffusion,” 2d ed., Oxford, 1975.Google Scholar