Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T15:26:55.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interface Effects on the Tensile and Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of Fiber-Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

B. S. Majumdar
Affiliation:
UES, Inc., 4401 Dayton-Xenia Road, Dayton, Ohio 45432
S. G. Warrier
Affiliation:
UES, Inc., 4401 Dayton-Xenia Road, Dayton, Ohio 45432
D. B. Miracle
Affiliation:
Materials Directorate, Wright Laboratory, WL/MLLM, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433–7817
Get access

Abstract

The effects of the interface on the tension and fatigue crack growth behavior of fiber-reinforced titanium matrix composites were studied using single-ply and single-fiber SiC/Ti-6Al-4V mini-composites with different SiC fibers and coatings. Attention was focused on fiber failure mechanisms in the absence of a matrix crack (tension loading), and on fatigue crack deceleration mechanisms. In contrast to established models of tensile failure, local load sharing behavior was observed for very weak interfaces, with plasticity playing a major role in enhancing stress concentration effects. The approach included statistical evaluation of fiber breaks, their locations, and comparisons between single-fiber and single-ply composites. Under fatigue loading, crack deflection behavior was found to be consistent with a strength based interface debonding model. Crack shielding through modulus mismatch was found to have a significant effect on crack growth rates, independent of bridging conditions, with a stronger interface performing better under such conditions. The ramifications of the different mechanisms on interface optimization for longitudinal and transverse properties of composites are indicated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Despres, J.F. and Monthioux, M., J. European Cer. Soc, Vol. 15, pp.209224 (1995)Google Scholar
2. He, M.Y. and Hutchinson, J.W., Int. J. Sol. and Structures, Vol. 25, pp. 10531067 (1989)Google Scholar
3. Cook, J. and Gordon, J.E., Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A 282, pp.508520 (1964)Google Scholar
4. Gupta, V., Argon, A.S., and Suo, Z., J. Appl. Mech., Vol. 59, pp. S79S87 (1992)Google Scholar
5. Majumdar, B.S., “Interfaces in MMCs”, in Titanium Matrix Composites, Ed. Mall, S. and Nicholas, T., Technomic Publications, in press (1997)Google Scholar
6. Curtin, W.A., J. Am. Cer. Soc, Vol. 74, p. 2837 (1991)Google Scholar
7. Rosen, B.W., AIAA Journal, Vol. 2, No. 11, pp.19851991 (1964)Google Scholar
8. Zweben, C. and Rosen, B.W., J. Mech. Phys. Solids, Vol. 18, pp.189206 (1970)Google Scholar
9. Batdorf, S.B. and Ghaffarian, R., J. Reinforced Plastics, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.165176 (1982)Google Scholar
10. He, M.Y., Evans, A.G., and Curtin, W.A., Acta Metall., Vol. 41, No.3, pp.871878 (1993)Google Scholar
11. Weber, C.H., Chen, X., Connell, S.J., and Zok, F.W., Acta Met., Vol. 42, pp. 34433450 (1994)Google Scholar
12. Boehlert, C.J., Majumdar, B.S., Krishnamurthy, S. & Miracle, D.B., Met. Trans., 28A, p.309 (1997)Google Scholar
13. Gundel, D.B. and Wawner, F.E., Compos. Science and Tech., in press (1996)Google Scholar
14. Gundel, D.B., Majumdar, B.S. & Miracle, D.B., Scripta Metall., 33, p.2057 (1995)Google Scholar
15. Gundel, D.B., Majumdar, B.S. and Miracle, D.B., Proc. ICCM-10, 2, Ed. Poursartip, A., Woodhead Publishing Ltd., U.K., pp. 703710, (1995)Google Scholar
16. Warrier, S.G., Gundel, D.B., Majumdar, B.S. & Miracle, D.B., Scripta Metall., 34, 293 (1995)Google Scholar
17. Majumdar, B.S., Matikas, T.E., and Miracle, D.B., J. of Composites-B, in press (1997)Google Scholar
18. Majumdar, B.S., Matikas, T.E., and Miracle, D.B., Proc of ICCM-11 in Australia, July (1997)Google Scholar
19. Curtin, W.A., J. Mat, Sc, Vol. 26, pp.52395253 (1991)Google Scholar
20. Nicholas, T. and Ahmad, J.A., Compos. Sc and Tech., Vol. 52, pp.2938 (1994)Google Scholar
21. Majumdar, B.S. and Miracle, D.B., Key Engg. Materials, Vol. 116–117, pp. 153172 (1996)Google Scholar
22. Marshall, D.B., Shaw, M.C., & Morris, W.L., Key Engg. Materials, Vol. 116–117, (1996); also Acta Metall., Vol. 40, No.3, p. 443 (1992)Google Scholar
23. Warrier, S.G., Majumdar, B.S., and Miracle, D.B., submitted to Acta met. (1996)Google Scholar
24. Warrier, S.G. and Majumdar, B.S., Materials Sc. and Engg., accepted for publication (1997)Google Scholar
25. Erdogan, F., Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 4, pp. 811840 (1972)Google Scholar
26. Gambone, M.L. and Wawner, F.E., MRS Proceedings, Vol. 350, pp. 111118 (1994)Google Scholar