Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T14:53:12.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinetics of Aqueous Alteration of P0798 Simulated Waste Glass in the Presence of Bentonite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

K. Yamaguchi
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Quantum Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan
Y. Inagaki
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Quantum Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan
T. Saruwatari
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Quantum Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan
K. Idemitsu
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Quantum Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan
T. Arima
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Quantum Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan
H. Yoshikawa
Affiliation:
Waste Isolation Research Division, JNC, Ibaraki 319-1194, Japan
M. Yui
Affiliation:
Waste Isolation Research Division, JNC, Ibaraki 319-1194, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Static aqueous alteration tests were performed with a Japanese simulated HLW glass, P0798, in the presence of bentonite in order to understand the effects of bentonite on the glass alteration kinetics and on the associated Cs release. Analogous alteration tests were performed in 0.001M NaOH solution without bentonite for comparison. The results indicated that; 1) at the initial stage of alteration up to 50 days, no remarkable difference was observed in the alteration rate between both cases “with” and “without” bentonite, 2) at the later stage beyond 50 days, however, the rate in the case “with” bentonite was larger than that in the case “without” bentonite. These results on the alteration rate were analyzed by use of a water-diffusion model. In the case “without” bentonite, a good agreement was observed between the model analysis and the experimental results at the initial stage of alteration up to 50 days, however, the model analysis deviated from the experimental results at the later stage beyond 50 days. In the case “with” bentonite, on the other hand, a good agreement was observed even at the later stage to give the value of the apparent diffusion coefficient, Di of 3.5×10−21m2/s. The comparison between both cases suggests that the alteration rate is controlled by the water diffusion in both cases “with” and “without” bentonite, however, the rate is depressed in the case “without” bentonite probably by the protective effects of the alteration layer developing at the glass surface. In the case “with” bentonite, on the other hand, the alteration layer is expected to be less protective. Cesium desorption tests performed for the altered glass and bentonite indicated that most of the cesium dissolved from the glass is retained in the secondary phase of smectite developing in the precipitated layer by sorption with ion-exchange in the case “without” bentonite. In the case “with” bentonite, however, it is likely to be sorbed at bentonite surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFFERENCE

[1] Godon, N., Vernaz, E., Thomassin, J.H. and Touray, J.C. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII (Mater.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc.127), p.97 (1989).Google Scholar
[2] Godon, N. and Vernaz, E. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII (Mater.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 176), p.319 (1990).Google Scholar
[3] Inagaki, Y., Saito, R., Furuya, H., Idemitsu, K. and Arima, T. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII (Mater.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 556), p.1083 (1999).Google Scholar
[4] Lemmens, K., J.Nucl.Mater.298, 11, (2001).Google Scholar
[5] Gin, S., Jollivet, P., Mestre, J.P., Jullien, M. and Pozo, C., Applied Geochemistry 16(2001) 878.Google Scholar
[6] Iseghem, P.V., Berghman, K. and Timmermans, W. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII (Mater.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc.176), p.292 (1990).Google Scholar
[7] Curti, E., Godon, N. and Vernaz, E.Y. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI (Mater.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 294), p.163 (1993).Google Scholar
[8] Idemitsu, K., Tachi, Y., Fruya, H., Inagaki, Y. and Arima, T. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI (Mater.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc.506), p.351 (1998).Google Scholar
[9] Grambow, B., Lutze, W. and Muller, R. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XV (Mater.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc.257), p.143 (1992).Google Scholar
[10] Inagaki, Y., Furuya, H., Idemitsu, K., Arima, T., J.Nucl.Mater. 208 (1994) 27.Google Scholar
[11] Gin, S., Mestre, J.P., J.Nucl.Mater. 295 (2001) 83.Google Scholar
[12] Aertsens, M., Lemmens, K. and Iseghem, P.V. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVI (Mater.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc.757), p.167 (2003).Google Scholar
[13] Inagaki, Y., Saruwatari, T. et al. , “Temperature Dependence of Long-Term Alteration Rate for Aqueous Alteration of P0798 Simulated Waste Glass under Smectite Forming Conditions”, these proceedings.Google Scholar
[14] Rebiscoul, Diane, Lee, Arie Van der et al. , J.Nucl.Mater. 326 (2004) 9.Google Scholar
[15] Rebiscoul, Diane, Frugier, Pierre et al. , J.Nucl.Mater. 342 (2005) 26.Google Scholar