Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:19:39.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leaching of Cesium and Uranium from Spent PWR fuel in the Gel-state Clays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

S. S. Kim ,
K. S. Chun ,
J. W. Choi ,
W. J. Cho  and
P. S. Hahn
S. S. Kim
Affiliation:
Radwaste Disposal Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, P.O. Box 105, Yuseong, Deajeon, Republic of Korea
K. S. Chun
Affiliation:
Radwaste Disposal Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, P.O. Box 105, Yuseong, Deajeon, Republic of Korea
J. W. Choi
Affiliation:
Radwaste Disposal Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, P.O. Box 105, Yuseong, Deajeon, Republic of Korea
W. J. Cho
Affiliation:
Radwaste Disposal Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, P.O. Box 105, Yuseong, Deajeon, Republic of Korea
P. S. Hahn
Affiliation:
Radwaste Disposal Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, P.O. Box 105, Yuseong, Deajeon, Republic of Korea
Get access

Abstract

The amounts of cesium and uranium released from crushed spent PWR fuel in the gel-state clays with a few ml of supernatant at hot cell temperature under Ar-atmosphere have been measured. The fractions of cesium dissolved from the fuel for 873 days were 0.29 and 0.25% in Boom clay/Boom-clay water and Ca-bentonite/synthetic granitic groundwater, respectively. These cesium fractions were very close to the gap inventory of cesium, which was determined to be around 0.30% in the previous experiment. The fraction of uranium released up to 193 days in the Boom clay media was 0.011% and this fraction has been retained until 873 days. Such this phenomenon was also obtained in the Ca-bentonite media even though the released fraction was higher than that in Boom clay. The increase of less than 0.001% in the dissolved uranium fraction between 193 and 873 days suggests that the long-term leach rate of uranium from spent fuel would be much less than 24 μg·m−2·day−1.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 932: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIX , 2006 , 67.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stroes-Gascoyne, S.; Johnson, L.H.; Tait, J.C.; McConnell, J.L.; Porth, R.J., “Leaching of used CANDU fuel: results from a 19-year leach test under oxidizing conditions”, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 465 (Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX), 511–518, Materials Research Society (1997)Google Scholar
2. de Pablo, J.; Casas, I.; Gimenez, J.; Marti, V.; Torrero, M. E., J. Nuclear Materials, 232(2,3), 138–145 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Sunder, S.; Shoesmith, D. W.; Miller, N. H., J. Nuclear Materials, 244(1), 66–74 (1997).Google Scholar
4. , Loida, Grambow, B., Geckeis, H., J.Nuclear Materials, 238(1), 11–22 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Wronkiewicz, D. J., Bates, J. K., Wolf, S. F., and Buck, E. C., J. Nuclear Materials, 238, 78 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Guilbert, S., Guittet, M. J., Barre, N., Gautier-Soyer, M., Trocellier, P., Gosset, D. and Andriambololona, Z., J. Nuclear Materials, 282, 75 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Cachoir, C., Lemmens, K., Berghe, S. Van den and Iseghem, P. Van, J. Nuclear Materials, 321, 49 (2003).Google Scholar
8. Forsyth, R. S., Werne, L. O. and Bruno, J., J. Nuclear Materials, 160, 218 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Eriksen, T. E., Eklund, U. B., Werme, L. and Bruno, J., J. Nuclear Materials, 227, 76 (1995).Google Scholar
10. Forsyth, R.S. and Werme, L. O. J. Nuclear Materials, 190, 3–19(1992).Google Scholar
11. Johnson, L.H., Tait, J. C., "Release of segregated nuclides from spent fuel", SKB-TR-97-18, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste management Co., Stockholm, Sweden (1997).Google Scholar
12. Kim, J.I., Gompper, K., Closs, K.D., Kessler, G., Faude, D., J. Nuclear Materials, 238(1), 1–10 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Missana, T., Garcia-Gutierrez, M. and Alonso, U., Applied Clay Science, 26, 137 (2004).Google Scholar
14. Rameback, H., Albinsson, Y., Skalberg, M., Eklund, U. B., Kjellberg, L. and Werme, L., Journal of Nuclear Materials, 277, 208 (2000).Google Scholar
15. Ramebaeck, -H.; Skaalberg, -M., Eklund, -U.B.; Kjellberg, -L., Werme, L, Radiochimica Acta 82, 167–171 (1998).Google Scholar
16. Casas, Ignasi et al. , "Dissolution studies of synthetic soddyite and uranophane", SKB-TR-97-15, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste management Co., Stockholm, Sweden (1997).Google Scholar
17. Perez, I., Casas, I., Martin, M. and Bruno, J., Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 64, 603 (2000).Google Scholar
18. ASTM(American Standards for Testing Materials), C 693-93, “Standard test method for density of glass by buoyancy”Google Scholar
19. Kim, S. S., Chun, K. S., Kim, Y. B. and Choi, J. W., “Initial release of nuclides from Spent PWR fuels”, in Proceedings of the 4th Korea-China joint workshop on nuclear waste management, p238, held on Feb, 17-19 2004 in Seoul (2004).Google Scholar
20. Forsyth, Roy, “SKB spent fuel corrosion programme- An evaluation of results from the experimental programme performed in the Studvik Hot Cell Laboratory”, SKB-TR-97-25, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste management Co., Stockholm, Sweden (1997).Google Scholar
21. Werme, L. O. and Forsyth, R. S., “SKB spent fuel corrosion programme – Status report 1988”, SKB-TR-89-04, p. 18, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste management Co., Stockholm, Sweden (1989).Google Scholar