Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T12:20:45.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low Temperature Growth Mechanisms for Rheed Oscillations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

R. Biswas
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory -USDOE, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011. Microelectronics Research Center, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
K. Roos
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory -USDOE, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
M. C. Tringides
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory -USDOE, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
Get access

Abstract

Low temperature (T<150 K) RHEED oscillations during the growth of ultrathin films suggest the presence of substantial adatom mobility. In most systems thermal diffusion can not account for the observed oscillations, and the origin of the oscillations is an open question. Experiments on Ag/Si(111) at 150 K demonstrate the absence of thermal diffusion due to the observed scaling in the RHEED intensity for different flux rates. We have performed molecular dynamics simulations to understand the mechanisms of RHEED oscillations at low temperature. Classical two- and three-body Si potentials were used together with an adatom mass that is 3.84 times the Si mass to account for the Ag/Si mass ratio. Results indicate that the landing site for the adatom is very important to predict whether a particular adatom will display lateral motion or not. A fraction of the adatoms incident near a maximum of the potential energy surface display significant lateral motion. The substrate stiffness for Ag/Si results in an energy transfer process which is much slower than that in fcc/fcc systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Egelhoff, W.F. Jr. and Jacob, I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 921 (1989).Google Scholar
[2] Kunkel, R., Poelsema, B., Verheij, L. K., and Comsa, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 733 (1990).Google Scholar
[3] Roos, K. R. and Tringides, M. C., Phys. Rev. B, in press.Google Scholar
[4] Evans, J. W., Sanders, D. E., Thiel, P. A., and DePristo, A. E., Phys. Rev. B 41, 5410 (1990).Google Scholar
[5] Nyberg, G.L., Kief, M.T., and Egelhoff, W., preprint.Google Scholar
[6] Weiss, P. S. and Eigler, D. M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2240 (1992).Google Scholar
[7] Sanders, D. E. and DePristo, A. E., Surf. Sci. 254, 341 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Wang, S. C. and Ehrlich, G., J. Chem. Phys. 94, 4071 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Roos, K. R. and Tringides, M. C., in preparation.Google Scholar
[10] Biswas, R. and Hamann, D. R., Phys. Rev. B 36, 6434 (1987); Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2001 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Biswas, R., Grest, G.S., and Soukoulis, C.M., Phys. Rev. B 38, 8154 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Kwon, I., Biswas, R., Grest, G.S. and Soukoulis, C.M., Phys. Rev. B 41, 3678 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Raynerd, G., Doust, T. N., and Venables, J. A., Surf. Sci. 261, 251 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Tosch, St. and Neddermeyer, H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 349 (1988).Google Scholar
[15] Mo, Y. W., Kleiner, J., Webb, M. B., and Lagally, M. G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1998 (1991).Google Scholar