Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:14:07.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular Dynamics Modeling of Growth, Micro-Structure and Stresses in Sputter-Deposited Films with Impurity Atom Incorporation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

C. C. Fang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
F. Jones
Affiliation:
Thomas J. Watson Research Center, IBM, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.
V. Prasad
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Get access

Abstract

The structure and intrinsic stresses of sputter-deposited thin films are studied via a two-dimensional molecular dynamics (MD) model. Two body potentials are used to represent the interaction between film atoms, substrate atoms, ions and argon molecules. First, a nearly perfect substrate having zero stress is constructed using constant temperature and constant pressure algorithms. Then the film is deposited with and without in-situ argon ion bombardment and with and without an argon background gas; a source of impurities. The adatom energy is varied in order to investigate its influence on the film structure. During the simulation the film is allowed to expand and contract depending on the intrinsic stresses. The models demonstrate, for the first time, that the transition from large tensile to large compressive stresses in sputter deposited thin films is caused by the incorporation of tightly packed argon impurity atoms, achieved only at sufficiently high levels of argon ion bombardment and nickel adatom energies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Klokholm, D. and Berry, B. S., J. Electrochem. Soc. 115, 823 (1968).Google Scholar
2. Thornton, J. A. and Hoffman, D. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 14, 164 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Sun, R. C., Tisone, T. C. and Cruzan, P. D., J. Appl. Phys. 46, 112 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hoffman, D. W. and Thornton, J. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 17, 380 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Hoffman, D. W. and Thornton, J. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 16, 134 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Entenberg, A., Lindberg, V., Fletcher, K., Gatesman, A. and Horwath, R. S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 5(6), 3373(1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Finegan, J. D. and Hoffman, R. W., Trans. Eighth National Vac. Svmp. (Pergamon. New York, 1961), p. 935.Google Scholar
8. Hoffman, D. W. and Thornton, J. A., Thin Solid Films 40, 355 (1977).Google Scholar
9. Fang, C. C., Jones, F. and Prasad, V., Thin Film Heat Transfer: Properties and Processing (HTD-Vol. 184, ASME, New York, 1991), p. 63.Google Scholar
10. Fang, C. C., Prasad, V. and Jones, F., being submitted to Comput. Phys. Commun. 11. C.C. Fang, F. Jones and V. Prasad, J. Appl. Phys. (submitted).Google Scholar
12. Moliére, G., Z. Naturforsh. A 2, 133 (1947).Google Scholar
13. Allen, M. P., Mol. Phys. 40, 1073 (1980).Google Scholar
14. Parrinello, M. and Rahman, A., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182 (1981).Google Scholar
15. Miiller, K. H., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 1796 (1987).Google Scholar