Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:01:51.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiscale toughness amplification in natural composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2012

Francois Barthelat
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University 817 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6 Canada
Reza Rabiei
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University 817 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6 Canada
Ahmad Khayer Dastjerdi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University 817 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6 Canada
Get access

Abstract

Hard biological materials such as bone and nacre exhibit remarkable mechanical performance, particularly in terms of fracture toughness, despite the weakness of their constituents. Mechanical performance of nacre and bone can largely be explained through their staggered microstructure where stiff inclusions of high aspect ratio are embedded in a softer matrix. The mineral inclusions provide hardness and stiffness while the organic matrix introduces ductility. The high performance of these natural structures is unmatched by any synthetic ceramic, which therefore makes them a substantial source of inspiration for development of new artificial materials. While the modulus and strength of these structures are well understood, fracture toughness remains unclear and controversial. In this work, chevron double cantilever beam fracture tests show that the interfaces in nacre have a low toughness, comparable to that of the tablets (in J terms). This highlights the important role of structural design on fracture toughness. At the next step, a fracture model is presented to explain the toughness amplification observed in natural staggered structures based on two essential extrinsic toughening mechanisms: crack bridging and process zone. The modeling results show that toughness can be further amplified by incorporating high concentrations of small inclusions with high aspect ratio. This conclusion is applicable to construction and optimization of natural and biomimetic composites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wegst, U.G.K. and Ashby, M.F., The mechanical efficiency of natural materials . Philosophical Magazine , 2004. 84(21): p. 21672181.Google Scholar
2. Buehler, M.J. and Yung, Y.C., Deformation and failure of protein materials in physiologically extreme conditions and disease . Nature Materials , 2009. 8(3): p. 175188.Google Scholar
3. Barthelat, F., et al. ., On the mechanics of mother-of-pearl: A key feature in the material hierarchical structure . Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids , 2007. 55(2): p. 225444.Google Scholar
4. Gupta, H.S., et al. ., Cooperative deformation of mineral and collagen in bone at the nanoscale . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 2006. 103(47): p. 1774117746.Google Scholar
5. Gao, H.J., Application of fracture mechanics concepts to hierarchical biomechanics of bone and bone-like materials . International Journal of Fracture , 2006. 138(1-4): p. 101137.Google Scholar
6. Currey, J.D., Mechanical Properties of Mother of Pearl in Tension . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London , 1977. 196(1125): p. 443463.Google Scholar
7. Gao, H.J., et al. ., Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: Lessons from nature . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 2003. 100(10): p. 55975600.Google Scholar
8. Barthelat, F. and Espinosa, H.D., An Experimental Investigation of Deformation and Fracture of Nacre-Mother of Pearl . Experimental Mechanics , 2007. 47(3): p. 311324.Google Scholar
9. Broz, M.E., Cook, R.F., and Whitney, D.L., Microhardness, toughness, and modulus of Mohs scale minerals . American Mineralogist , 2006. 91(1): p. 135142.Google Scholar
10. Khayer Dastjerdi, A., Rabiei, R., and Barthelat, F., Interfacial fracture toughness of nacre. in preparation.Google Scholar
11. Anderson, T.L., Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd edition. 2nd ed. 1995: CRC Press.Google Scholar
12. Smith, B.L., et al. ., Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibres and composites . Nature (London) , 1999. 399(6738): p. 761763.Google Scholar
13. Tvergaard, V. and Hutchinson, J.W., On the toughness of ductile adhesive joints . Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids , 1996. 44(5): p. 789800.Google Scholar
14. Evans, A.G., et al. ., Mechanisms of Toughening in Rubber Toughened Polymers . Acta Metallurgica , 1986. 34(1): p. 7987.Google Scholar
15. Wang, R.Z., et al. ., Deformation mechanisms in nacre . Journal of Materials Research , 2001. 16: p. 24852493.Google Scholar
16. Barthelat, F. and Rabiei, R., Toughness amplification in natural composites . Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids , 2011. 59(4): p. 829840.Google Scholar
17. Bekah, S., Rabiei, R., and Barthelat, F., Structure, Scaling and Performance of Natural Micro- and Nanocomposites . Bionanoscience , 2011: p. in review.Google Scholar