Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T17:34:27.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Some Natural Organic Yellow Colorants in Aztec Codices: the Florentine Codex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Arie Wallert*
Affiliation:
The Getty Conservation Institute, Museum Services Laboratory, J.Paul Getty Museum, 17985 Pacific Coast Highway, Malibu CA 90265
Get access

Abstract

Little is known about the colorants that were used in Aztec manuscript illumination. The study of contemporary sources may give us useful information. The Florentine Codex gives names and descriptions for colorants that were traditionally used by the Aztec scribes. These descriptions allow us to identify the botanical source of some of these colorants.

The identification of the original plant materials made it possible to come to a reliable reconstruction of the colours. The colorants that come from plants show a large variation of chromophores and may belong to the flavonoids, the carotenoids, or the anthocyanins.

The chemical constitutions of some of these colorants and the possible methods for their identification are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Berdan, F.F., The Aztecs, (Chelsea House Publ., New York, 1989), p. 58.Google Scholar
2 Schwede, R., Uber das Papier der Maya-Codices und einiger altmexikanischer Bilderhandschriften, (Dresden, 1912).Google Scholar
3 Anderson, A.J.O., El Palacio, LV, 2027 (1948).Google Scholar
4 fra Bernardino de Sahagun, The Florentine Codex: A General history of the Things of New Spain, Books 1-12, translated by Arthur Anderson, J.O. and Dibble, Charles E., (Santa Fe and Salt Lake City: School of American Research and the University of Utah), 1950-1981.Google Scholar
5 The Badianus Manuscript (Codex Barberini, Latin 241) Vatican Library, An Aztec Herbal of 1552, introduction, translation and annotation by Emmart, Emily Walcott (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press 1940).Google Scholar
6 Hernandez, F., Historia Natural de Nueva España, vol. II, Historia de las Plantas de Nueva Españia (reprint Universidad Nacional de Mexico 1959).Google Scholar
7 Torres, L.M., in: Materials Issues in Art and Archeaology, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc., Pittsburg PA, 1988) pp. 123128.Google Scholar
8 Dempster, L.T., The genus Galium (Rubiaceae) in Mexico and Central America, (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1978). R. Ruiz, Cultivador, 11 (2) pp. 51-53 (1876).Google Scholar
9 Greenman, J.M., Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci., 33, pp. 455470 (1898).Google Scholar
10 Standley, P.C., Trees and Shrubs of Mexico (Oxalidaceae-Turneraceae), Contr. US Nat. Herb., Vol. 23, Part 3, Washington 1923.Google Scholar
11 Verhecken, A., Wouters, J., Bul. IRPA/KIK, 22 pp. 207239 (1988). H. Schweppe, H. Roosen-Runge, Artists' Pigments, (vol. 1 ed. Feller, R., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1986), 255-283.Google Scholar
12 McJunkin, D.M., PhD thesis, UCLA Los Angeles 1991. A. Wallert, Maltechnik/Restauro, 92 pp. 52-70 (1986).Google Scholar
13 Graaff, J.H. Hofenk-de, ICOM Comm. Cons. Plen. Meeting., Amsterdam 1969. H. Schweppe, Handbuch der Naturfarbstoffe, (ecomed Verlagsgesellschaft, Landsberg/Lech 1992).Google Scholar
14 Heller, W., Forkmann, G., in: The Flavonoids; advances in research since 1980, ed. Harborne, J.B. (London Chapman & Hall 1988), pp. 399-422, 401.Google Scholar
15 Harborne, J.B., Phytochemical Methods; a guide to modern techniques of plant analysis, (Chapman & Hall, London 1991) p. 129.Google Scholar
16 Yuncker, T.G., Univ. Ill., Biol. Monogr., 6, 1141 (1921).Google Scholar
17 Desmoulins, C., Comp. Rend., 19 Sess. Congr. Scientif., Toulouse, 2, pp. 243320 (1852).Google Scholar
18 Balestrier, L. de, Progr. Mex., 4, pp 783784 (1897). and Bol. Soc. Agr. Mex., 15, p. 80 (1890-91).Google Scholar
19 Neamtu, G., Bodea, C., Rev. Roum. Biochim. 6 pp. 227231 (1969).Google Scholar
20 Dinelli, G., Bonetti, A, Tibiletti, E., Weed Res. 33 pp. 253260 (1993).Google Scholar
21 Rose, J.N., Gard. For. 8 p. 484 (1895). W. E. Safford, J. Wash. Acad. Sc., 8 pp. 613-620 (1918).Google Scholar
22 Chmiel, E., Sutfeld, R., Wiermann, R, 'Bioch. Physiol. Pfl., 178 pp. 139146 (1983).Google Scholar
23 Samata, y., Inazu, K., Takahashi, K, Ikushu-gaku zasshi; Jap. J. Breed. 27/3 pp. 223236 (1977).Google Scholar
24 Hayashi, K., Acta Phytochim., 12 pp. 8395 (1941).Google Scholar
25 Karrer, W., Konstutition und Vorkommen der organischen Pflanzenstoffe, (Birkhäuser Verlag Basel und Stuttgart, 1958), p. 593.Google Scholar
26 Wolf, F.T., Stevens, M.V., Photochem. Photobiol., 6 pp. 597599 (1967). C.H. Eugster, E. Märki-Fischer, Z. angew. Chem. 30 (1991), 654-672. p657.Google Scholar
27 Nuhn, p., Naturstoffchemie: mikrobielle, pflanzliche und tierische Naturstoffe, (S. Hirzel Wissenschaftliche Veragsgesellschaft Stuttgart, 1990), pp. 490493.Google Scholar
28 Mabry, T.J., Markham, K.R., Thomas, M.B., The Systematic Identification of Flavonoids, (Springer Verlag Berlin, 1970). Wollenweber, E., Jay, M., in: The Flavonoids; Advances in Research since 1980, ed. J.B. Harborne (Chapman & Hall, London 1988) pp. 233-296, 292.Google Scholar
29 Jatkar, S.K.K., Mattoo, B.N., J. Ind. Chem. Soc., 33 pp. 623629, and pp. 641-646 (1956). A. Wallert, (forthcoming).Google Scholar