Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T05:01:00.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oxidation Behavior of FeTbCoPt and FeTbCoZr Magneto-Optic Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

D. Majumdar
Affiliation:
Analytical Technology Division, Research Laboratories, Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY 14650-2132.
T. K. Hatwar
Affiliation:
Diversified Technologies Group, Research Laboratories, Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY 14650-2017.
Get access

Abstract

Thin films of rare earlh transition metal (RETM) alloys are considered to be promising as media for high-density data storage in magneto-optic (MO) devices. These alloys, however, degrade rapidly through oxidation and corrosion due to the high reactivity of the RE metal. The addition of alloying elements could increase the intrinsic stability of the MO media [1,2]. Generally, two types of alloying elements have been considered: (1) an active metal (such as aluminum, titanium, chromium) or (2) a noble metal (such as platinum or gold). Although such alloying additions could improve the corrosion resistance, the exact mechanism of protection is not clearly understood. In this paper, we report the effects of Zr (active element) and Pt (noble element) on the oxidation behavior of FeTbCo MO films. Efforts were made to get a better understanding of the protection mechanisms provided by these two types of elements by using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Aratani, K., Kobayashi, T., Tsunashima, S. and Uchiyama, S., J. Appl. Phys. 57, 3903 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Hatwar, T.K. and Majumdar, D., IEEE Trans. Magnetics, 24(6), 2449 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Orchard, A.F. and Thornton, G., J. Electron Spectroscop. 13, 27 (1978).Google Scholar
4. Sarma, D.D., Hegde, M.S. and Rao, C.N.R., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2(77), 1509 (1981).Google Scholar
5. L Guczi, Matusek, K. and Eszterle, M., J. Catalysis.60, 121 (1979).Google Scholar
6. de Gonzalez, C.O. and Garcia, E.A., Surface Sci. 193, 305 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Kumar, L., Sarma, D.D. and Krummacher, S., Appl. Surface Sci. 32, 309 (1988).Google Scholar