Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-lpd2x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T08:07:33.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Painted Qero Cups from the Inka and Colonial Periods in Peru: An Analytical Study of Pigments and Media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Richard Newman
Affiliation:
Scientific Research Lab, Museum of Fine Arts, 465 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Michele Derrick
Affiliation:
Scientific Research Lab, Museum of Fine Arts, 465 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Get access

Abstract

Qero cups, made from wood, ceramics and precious metals, have been used for millennia in the Andean region for ritual consumption of maize beer. From the cusp of the Inka-Colonial period, painted decoration became more common on qero cups. Most of the painted decoration actually consists of thin layers of a pigmented rubbery material that was cut and inlaid into shallow carved cavities in the wood substrate. For this project, 312 paint samples from 53 qerocups in collections of the Brooklyn Museum of Art, National Museum of the American Indian/Smithsonian Institution, Metropolitan Museum of Art, and American Museum of Natural History were analyzed. The study of paints is part of larger study of the technology of over 150 qero cups from these four collections. Samples from seven qeros in Peruvian collections have also been analyzed. Nearly two dozen pigments have been identified, including mineral, synthetic inorganic compounds, and natural dyestuffs. The binder consisted of an unusual natural resin (commonly called ‘mopa mopa’) usually mixed with a nondrying or semidrying oil. This resin, which was used at least locally during the pre-Inka period and continued to be used through the Colonial period and later, came from a tree that grows in the montana of southwest Colombia, a region that was part of the northernmost extension of the Inka empire.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kaplan, E., Pearlstein, E., Howe, E., and Levinson, J., in Objects Specialty Group Postprints, Volume 6, 1999 (The American Institute for Conservation, Washington, DC, 1999) pp. 94111.Google Scholar
2.Ibid., Iconos: Revista peruana de conservación, arte, y arqueologia, Lima, Peru 2, 30–38. (1998).Google Scholar
3. Howe, E., met objectives 3 (1), 46. (2001).Google Scholar
4. Botina, J. R. , P., Barniz o Mopa Mopa (Corporación Autónoma Regional del Putumayo, Mocoa, Colombia, 1990).Google Scholar
5. Mora-Osejo, L.E., Caldasia 2 (55), 532. (1977).Google Scholar
6. Mills, J. S. and White, R., The Organic Chemistry of Museum Objects, second edition (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1994) pp. 95113.Google Scholar
7. Ramos, L., García, M. C., Parra, E., and Blasco, C., in Encuentro Internacional de Peruanistas, Tomo II (Universidad Lima, Lima, Peru, 1998) pp. 109127.Google Scholar
8. Schilling, M., (private communication); White, R., and Pilc, J., National Gallery Technical Bulletin 16, 85 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Kirby, J., and White, R., National Gallery Technical Bulletin 17, 5680. (1996); S. Halpine, Studies in Conservation 41, 76–94. (1996).Google Scholar
10. Wouters, J., and Rosario-Chirinos, N., Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 31, 237255. (1992).Google Scholar
11. Mills, J.S. and White, R., The Organic Chemistry of Museum Objects, second edition (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1994) pp. 171172.; J. S. Mills and R. White, National Gallery Technical Bulletin 6, 7 (1982).Google Scholar
12.Unpublished research report on a repainted Mayan pot, Classic period, 300–600. AD, on longterm loan to the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (no. TL16.466). Report date: April 24, 1995.Google Scholar