Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:15:20.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Potential of Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon-Sulfur Alloys for Absorber Materials in Photovoltaic Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

P. C. Taylor  and
S. L. Wang
P. C. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
S. L. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Get access

Abstract

The group VI element, sulfur, is an inefficient donor in hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H). The compensation by sulfur donors of the p-type conductivity obtained with diborane in a-Si:H provides additional evidence of the role of sulfur as a donor. By adding equal amounts of diborane and hydrogen sulfide in the plasma the dark conductivity at room temperature can be reduced by one to two orders of magnitude compared to the corresponding p-type a-Si:H with the same boron concentration. Unlike phosphorus doping, a portion of the sulfur-related donors is passivated by hydrogen in the annealed state. This passivated portion can be rendered electrically active by optical excitation. This effect is similar to that which has been called persistent photoconductivity (PPC) and occurs in some compensated samples of a-Si:H and in some multilayer structures. The PPC effect has the opposite effect on both the photo- and dark conductivities from the Staebler-Wronski effect. For this reason it is possible to find an appropriate S/Si ratio where the two effects cancel as far as the conductivity is concerned. For an appropriate concentration of S in “intrinsic” a-Si:H one can obtain samples with high photoconductivity and essentially no degradation in either the dark or the photo-conductivities upon prolonged optical excitation (light soaking). These results suggest that at least the majority carriers are unaffected; however, it remains unclear what effect this second metastability will have on the minority carriers, and hence on PV device applications. The general idea that the addition of a second metastability to hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) might counteract the deleterious consequences of the Staebler-Wronski effect is presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 426: Symposium J – Thin Films for Photovoltaic and Related Device , 1996 , 37
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wang, S. L., Lin, Z. H., Viner, J. M. and Taylor, P. C., MRS Syrup. Proc. 336, 559 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Wang, S. L. and Taylor, P. C., Solid State Commun. 95, 361 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Wang, S. L. and Taylor, P. C., AIP Conf Proc. (PV Program review) (1995).Google Scholar
4. Wang, S. L., Viner, J. M. and Taylor, P. C., J. Non-Cryst. Solids (semi conf 95) (1995), in press,Google Scholar
5. Wang, S. L., Viner, J. M., Anani, M. and Taylor, P. C., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 164–166, 251 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Wang, S. L. and Taylor, P. C., MRS Syrmp Proc. 377, 307 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Sheikman, M. K. and Shik, A. Ya., Soy. Phys. Semicond. 10, 128 (1976).Google Scholar
8. Bennett, M. S., Newton, J. L. and Rajan, K., Proc. Of 7th European PV Conf, edited by Goetzberger, A., Palz, W. and Willeke, G. (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1986), p. 544.Google Scholar
9. Spear, W. E. and LeComber, P. G., Solid State Commun. 17, 1199 (1975).Google Scholar
10. Grirnmeiss, H. G. and Janzen, E. in Deep Centers in Semiconductors, Pantelides, S. T., ed. (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1986), p. 87; H. J. Hrowski and B. J. Adler, J. Chem. Phys. 33, 980 (1960); W. Kaiser, P. H. Keck and C. F. Lange, Phys. Rev. 101, 1264 (1956); J. W. Corbett, R. S. MacDonald and G. D. Watkins, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 25, 873 (1964).Google Scholar
11. Peale, R. E., Muro, K. and Sievers, A. J., Materials Science Forum Vols. 65 & 66, 151 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Pensl, G., Roos, G., Holm, C., Sirtl, E. and Johnson, N. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 451 (1987).Google Scholar
13.13. Pensl, G., Roos, G., Stolz, P., Johnson, N. M. and Holm, C., Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. 104, 241 (1988).Google Scholar
14. Zhang, S. B. and Chadi, D. J., Phys. Rev. B 41, 3882 (1990).Google Scholar