Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:02:49.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Practical Sorption Kinetics of TiCl3 Catalyzed NaAlH4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Xia Tang ,
Daniel A Mosher  and
Donald L Anton
Xia Tang
Affiliation:
United Technologies Research Center 411 Silver Lane East Hartford, CT 06108
Daniel A Mosher
Affiliation:
United Technologies Research Center 411 Silver Lane East Hartford, CT 06108
Donald L Anton
Affiliation:
United Technologies Research Center 411 Silver Lane East Hartford, CT 06108
Get access

Abstract

Sodium alanate has been studied as a promising candidate material for reversible hydrogen storage due to its intermediate temperature range and relatively high storage capacity. Its rates of desorption and absorption of hydrogen have been shown to be enhanced by the addition of Ti in various compounds. To date, the sorption kinetics, especially absorption kinetics, is not well understood. In this study, a practical sorption kinetics model for TiCl3 catalyzed NaAlH4 has been developed to assist in the engineering design and evaluation of a prototype hydrogen storage system.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 884: Symposium GG – Materials and Technology for Hydrogen Storage and Generation , 2005 , GG4.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kiyobayashi, T., Srinivasan, S.S., Sun, D. and Jensen, C.M., J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 7671–7674 (2003).Google Scholar
2 Sandrock, G., Gross, K. and Thomas, G., J. Alloys Comp. 339 299–308 (2002).Google Scholar
3 Gross, K.J., Majzoub, E.H. and Spangler, S.W., J. Alloys Comp. 356-357, 423–428 (2003).Google Scholar
4 Anton, D.L., J. Alloys Comp. 356-357, 400–404 (2003).Google Scholar
5 Luo, W. and Gross, K.J., J. Alloys Comp. 385 224–231 (2002).Google Scholar
6 El-Osery, I.A., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 8, 191–198 (1983).Google Scholar
7 El-Osairy, M.A., El-Osery, I.A., Metwally, A.M. and Hassan, M.A., J. Alloys Comp. 202, 125–128(1993)Google Scholar
8 El-Gammal, M.A., El-Osery, I.A., Metwally, A.M. and Hassan, M.A., Modeling, Measurement and Control, 46, 35–44 (1994).Google Scholar
9 El-Osairy, M.A., El-Osery, I.A., Metwally, A.M. and Hassan, M.A., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 18, 517–524 (1993)Google Scholar
10 Gross, K.J., Thomas, G.J. and Jensen, C.M., J. Alloys Comp. 330-332 683–690 (2002).Google Scholar
11 Sandrock, G., Gross, K. and Thomas, G., J. Alloys Comp. 339 299–308 (2002).Google Scholar