Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T21:28:53.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary Analysis of Important Site-Specific Dose Assessment Parameters and Exposure Pathways Applicable to a Groundwater Release Scenario at Yucca Mountain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

P. A. Laplante ,
S. J. Maheras  and
M. S. Jarzemba
P. A. Laplante
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, 12300 Twinbrook Pkwy, Rockville, MD 20852
S. J. Maheras
Affiliation:
Independent Consultant, 366 Ranch Drive, Idaho Falls, ID 83404
M. S. Jarzemba
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, 6220 Culebra Rd, San Antonio, TX 78238
Get access

Abstract

To develop capabilities for compliance determination, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) conducts total system performance assessment (TSPA) for the proposed repository at Yucca Mountain (YM) in an iterative manner. Because the new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard for YM may set a dose or risk limit, an auxiliary study was conducted to develop estimates of site-specific dose assessment parameters for future TSPAs. YM site-relevant data was obtained for irrigation, agriculture, resuspension, crop interception, and soil. A Monte Carlo based importance analysis was used to identify predominant parameters for the groundwater pathway. In this analysis, the GENII-S code generated individual annual total effective dose equivalents (TEDEs) for 20 nuclides and 43 sampled parameters based upon unit groundwater concentrations. Scatter plots and correlation results indicate the crop interception fraction, food transfer factors, consumption rates, and irrigation rate are correlated with TEDEs for specific nuclides. Influential parameter groups correspond to expected pathway behavior of specific nuclides. Results for nuclides that transfer more readily to plants, such as 99Tc, indicate crop ingestion pathway parameters are most highly correlated with the TEDE, and those that transfer to milk (59Ni) or beef (79Se, 129I, 135Cs, 137Cs) show predominant correlations with animal product ingestion pathway parameters. Such relationships provide useful insight to important parameters and exposure pathways applicable to doses from specific nuclides.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 412: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX , 1995 , 897
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Committee on Technical Bases for Yucca Mountain Standards, Technical Bases for Yucca Mountain Standards, (National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1995), p. 4–7.Google Scholar
2. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NRC Iterative Performance Assessment Phase 2: Development of Capbilities for Review of A Performance Assessment for a High-Level Waste Repsitory, (Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG-1464, Washington DC, 1995), Ch. 7.Google Scholar
3. Napier, B.A., Peloquin, R.A., Strenge, D.L., and Ramsdell, J.V., GENII: The Hanford Environmental Radiation Dosimetry Software System. Volumes 1. 2. and 3: Conceptual Reoresentation. Users Manual. Code Maintenance Manual, (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, PNL-6584, Richland, WA, 1988).Google Scholar
4. LaPlante, P.A., Maheras, S.J., and Jarzemba, M.S., Initial Analysis of Selected Site Specific Dose Assessment Parameters and Exposure Pathways Applicable to a Groundwater Release Scenario at Yucca Mountain, (Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, CNWRA-95-018, San Antonio, TX, 1995).Google Scholar
5. Leigh, C.D., Thompson, B.M., Campbell, J.E., Longsine, D.E., Kennedy, R.A., and Napier, B.A., in User's Guide for GENII-S: A Code for Statistical and Deterministic Simulation of Radiation Doses to Humans from Radionuclides in the Environment, (Sandia National Laboratories, SAND 91-0561, Albuquerque, NM, 1993).Google Scholar
6. U.S. Department of Commerce, Census of Agriculture. Volume 1: Geographic Area Series. Part 28: Nevada State and County Data, (AC87-A-28, Washington DC, 1989), p. 132–190.Google Scholar
7. Nevada Agricultural Statistics Service, Nevada Agricultural Statistics: 1987–88, (Reno, NV, 1988).Google Scholar
8. Nevada Division of Water Resources, Preliminary Summary of Ground Water Pumpage Inventory for Amargosa Valley Basin No. 230 from 1989 through 1993; Preliminary Special Hydrographic Abstract for Valley Basin No. 230 from the Nevada Division of Water Resources Water Rights Database, Carson City, NV, 1995 (unpublished).Google Scholar
9. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Interpretations Record Database information from National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE, relevant to local soil types in Amargosa Valley determined from soil characterization maps F-12 Big Dune SE and G-12 Lathrop Wells SW orthophotopods, obtained from the Soil Conservation Service, Tonopah, NV, 1995 (unpublished).Google Scholar
10. Anspaugh, L.R., Shinn, J.H., Phelps, P.L., and Kennedy, N.C., Health Physics 29, 571 (1975).Google Scholar
11. Otis, M.D., Ph.D. Dissertation, Colorado State University, 1983.Google Scholar
12. Breshears, D.D., Kirchner, T.B., Otis, M.D., and Whicker, F.W., Health Physics 57 (6), 943 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Anspaugh, L.R., Retention by Vegetation of Radionuclides Deposited in Rainfall-A Literature Summary, (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-53810, Livermore, CA, 1987), p. 22–23.Google Scholar
14. Kennedy, W.E. and Strenge, D.L., Residual Radioactive Contamination From Decommissioning: Technical Basis for Translating Contamination Levels to Annual Total Effective Dose Equivalent, (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, NUREG/CR-5512, Vol.1., Richland, WA, 1992), Ch. 6.Google Scholar
15. International Atomic Energy Agency, Handbook of Parameter Values for the Prediction of Radionuclide Transfer in Temperate Environments, (IAEA, Technical Report Series No 364, Vienna, Austria, 1994), p. 17–25.Google Scholar
16. Baes, C.F. III, Sharp, R.D., Sjoreen, A.L., and Shor, R.W., A Review and Analysis of Parameters for Assessing Transport of Environmentally Released Radionuclides Through Agdculture, (Oak Ridge National Laboratories, ORNL-5786, Oak Ridge, TN, 1982).Google Scholar
17. Hoffman, F.O., Gardner, R.H., and Eckerman, K.F., Variability in Dose Estimates Associated with the Food Chain Transport and Ingestion of Selected Radionuclides, (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, NUREG/CR-2612, Oak Ridge, TN, 1982).Google Scholar
18. Eckerman, K.F. and Ryman, J.C., External Exposure to Radionuclides in Air. Water. And Soil: Exposure-to-Dose Coefficients for General Application. Based on the 1987 Federal Radiation Protection Guidance, (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Federal Guidance Report No. 12, Oak Ridge, TN, 1993).Google Scholar
19. Breshears, D.D., Kirchner, T.B., and Whicker, F.W., Ecological Applications 2 (3), 285 (1992).Google Scholar
20. Iman, R.L. and Conover, W. J, Technometrics 21 (4), 499–509 (1979).Google Scholar
21. Sandia National Laboratories, Preliminary Performance Assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Volume 3, (SAND92-0700/3, Albuquerque, NM, 1992), p. 2.3–2.4.Google Scholar
22. Eslinger, P.W., Doremus, L.A., Engel, D.W., Miley, T.B., Murphy, M.T. et al., Preliminary Total-System Analysis of a Potential High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository at Yucca Mountain, (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, PNL-8444, Richland, WA, 1993), p. 2.3–2.5.Google Scholar
23. Duguid, J.O., Andrews, R.W., Brandsetter, E., Dale, T.F., and Reeves, M., Total System Performance Assessment–1993: An Evaluation of the Potential Yucca Mountain Repository, (Intera, Inc., B00000000-01717-2200-00099 Rev. 01, Las Vegas, NV, 1993), p. 2.3–2.4.Google Scholar
24. Sandia National Laboratories, Total-System Performance Assessment for Yucca Mountain-SNL Second Iteration (TSPA- 1993), (Sandia National Laboratories, SAND93-2675, Albuquerque, NM, 1994), p. 5.8–5.14.Google Scholar
25. U.S. Department of Energy, Site Characterization Plan: Yucca Mountain Site. Nevada Research and Development Area. Nevada. Volume II, (DOE/RW-0199, Washington, DC, 1988). p. 3.75.Google Scholar
26. Whicker, W.F., Kirchner, T.B., Breshears, D.D., and Otis, M.D., Health Physics 59 (5), 645 (1990).Google Scholar