Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-31T05:35:25.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preparation of Monophasic [NZP] Radiophases: Potential Host Matrices for the Immobilization of Reprocessed Commercial High-Level Wastes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

H. T. Hawkins ,
B. E. Scheetzj  and
G. D. Guthrie Jr.
H. T. Hawkins
Affiliation:
Nuclear Materials Technology and Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
B. E. Scheetzj
Affiliation:
Intercollege Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
G. D. Guthrie Jr.
Affiliation:
Earth and Environmental Sciences Divisions, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
Get access

Abstract

The compositional flexibility of the sodium zirconium phosphate (NaZr2(PO4)3) structure has been exploited in the design of monophasic radiophases capable of immobilizing the most common cations associated with reprocessed high-level commercial waste streams. Highly crystalline, monophasic members of the NaZr2(PO4)3 structural family ([NZP]) have been prepared with conventional processing methods and equipment. These radiophases were tailored to accommodate 10–20 wt % modified PW-4b simulated calcine as single phases isostructural with NaZr2(PO4)3. To meet the challenge of designing monophasic materials capable of accommodating the chemical complexity of PW-4b, an ionic substitution scheme based on crystal chemical principles was developed. The radiophases were prepared with inexpensive, inorganic precursors and a solution sol-gel method; these materials were heat treated and/or sintered under a variety of conditions to determine the optimum conditions for single phase [NZP] formation. X-ray powder diffraction provided valuable information that was used to assess the suitability of the ionic substitution model developed in this investigation. The results of this investigation suggest that monophasic [NZP] radiophases capable of accommodating 10–20 wt % modified PW-4b simulated calcine may be continuously processed with conventional ceramic processing methods and equipment. Moreover, the relatively low temperatures involved and the reproducibility of the process make [NZP] radiophases economically attractive hosts for radioactive and heavy metal industrial wastes.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 465: Symposium II – Scienfific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX , 1996 , 387
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Roy, R., Vance, E. R., and Alamo, J., Mat. Res. Bull. 17, 585–589 (1982).Google Scholar
[2] Orlova, A. I., Volkov, Yu. F., Melkaya, R. F., Masterova, L. Yu., Kulikov, I. A., and Alferov, V., Radiochem. 36 [4], 322–325 (1994).Google Scholar
[3] Agrawal, D. K. and Roy, R., J. Mater. Sci. 20, 4617–4623 (1985).Google Scholar
[4] Oota, T. and Yamai, I., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69, 1–6 (1986).Google Scholar
[5] Scheetz, B. E., Kormaneni, S., Fajun, W., Yang, L. J., Ollinen, M., and Roy, R. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, edited by Jantzen, C. M., Stone, J. A., and Ewing, R. C., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 44, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 903–910.Google Scholar
[6] Orlova, A. I., Zyryanov, V. N., Egor'kova, O. V., and Demarin, V. T., Radiochem. 38 [1], 20–23 (1996).Google Scholar
[7] Scheetz, B. E., Agrawal, D. K., Breval, E., and Roy, R., Waste Manage. 14 [6], 489–505 (1994).Google Scholar
[8] Alamo, J., Solid State Ionics 63–65, 547–561 (1993).Google Scholar
[9] Roy, R., Agrawal, D. K., Alamo, J., and Roy, R. A., Mater. Res. Bull. 19, 471–477 (1984).Google Scholar
[10] Kohler, H. and Schulz, H., Mater. Res. Bull. 18, 589–592 (1983).Google Scholar
[11] Hong, H. Y-P., Mat. Res. Bull. 11, 173–182 (1976).Google Scholar
[12] Alami Talbi, M., Brochu, R., Parent, C., Rabardel, L., and Le Flem, G., J. Solid State Chem. 110, 350–355 (1994)Google Scholar
[13] Nectoux, F. and Tabuteau, A., Radiochem. and Radioanalyt. Lett. 49 [1], 43–48 (1981).Google Scholar
[14] Gray, W. J., Rad. Waste Manage. 1, 147–169 (1981).Google Scholar
[15] Shannon, R. D. and Prewitt, C. T., Acta Crystall. B25, 925–945 (1969).Google Scholar
[16] Shannon, R. D., Acta Crystall. A32, 751–767 (1976).Google Scholar
[17] McCarthy, G. J. and Davidson, M. T., Ceram. Bull. 54, 782–786 (1975).Google Scholar
[18] Smith, D. K., Nichols, M. C., and Zolensky, M. E., POWD 10: A FORTRAN IV Program for Calculating X-ray Powder Diffraction Patterns- Version 10; Department of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 1983.Google Scholar
[19] Mathematical Crystallography (Reviews in Mineralogy Vol. 15), Boisen, M. B. Jr. and Gibbs, G. V. (The Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, 1985) 56–72.Google Scholar
[20] Jenkins, R. in Modern Powder Diffraction (Reviews in Mineralogy Vol. 20), edited by Bish, D. L. and Post, J. E. (The Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, 1989) 47–69.Google Scholar