Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T02:11:32.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pulsed Field Gradient NMR Investigation of Molecular Mobility of Trimethoxymethane in Nafion Membranes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Y. Wu ,
T. A. Za Wodzinski ,
M. C. Smart ,
S. G. Greenbaum ,
G.K.S. Prakash  and
G. A. Olah
Y. Wu
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Hunter College of CUNY, New York, NY 10021, steve.greenbaum@hunter.cuny.edu Electronic Materials Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
T. A. Za Wodzinski
Affiliation:
Electronic Materials Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
M. C. Smart
Affiliation:
Electrochemical Technologies Group, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109 Loker Hydrocarbon Research Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles CA 90089
S. G. Greenbaum
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Hunter College of CUNY, New York, NY 10021, steve.greenbaum@hunter.cuny.edu Electrochemical Technologies Group, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109
G.K.S. Prakash
Affiliation:
Loker Hydrocarbon Research Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles CA 90089
G. A. Olah
Affiliation:
Loker Hydrocarbon Research Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles CA 90089
Get access

Abstract

Molecular mobility of water and trimethoxymethane (TMM) in NAFION membranes of two different equivalent weights (EW), 1100 and 1500, were investigated. Self-diffusion coefficients were determined by the NMR pulsed field gradient method, using the water and methyl protons NMR signals, in saturated NAFION samples containing concentrations of TMM in water varying between 0.5 and 14 M, and at temperatures varying from 30°C to 80°C. Diffusion of molecular species containing methyl protons is more than a factor of two slower in the 1500 EW membrane than in the 1100 EW membrane at 30°C and 1 M concentration. The difference rises to about a factor of four at 80°C and 14 M concentration. These differences are attributed to the lower extent of plasticization of the higher EW material as well as the greater effective distance between acid functional groups. NAFION samples containing methanol/water mixtures were also investigated. Comparison with the methanol results and the permeation behavior, as characterized by gas Chromatographie methods, show that more than half of the TMM is hydrolyzed to methanol as it passes through the acidic membrane. The implications of these findings for alternative fuels in direct oxidation fuel cells are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 496: Symposium Y – Materials For Electrochemical Energy Storage & Conversion II… , 1997 , 223
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Smart, M.C., Prakash, G.K.S., Olah, G.A., Narayanan, S.R., Frank, H., Surampudi, S., Halpert, G., Kosek, J. and Cropley, C., in The Electrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts, vol.96–2, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Pennington, NJ, 1996, abstract # 789; andGoogle Scholar
Narayanan, S.R., Vamos, E., Surampudi, S., Frank, H., Halpert, G., Prakash, G.K.S., Smart, M.C., Knieler, R., Olah, G. A.,. Kosek, and Cropley, C., J. Electrochem. Soc., 144, 4195 (1997).Google Scholar
2. see, for example, Zawodzinski, T. A., Neeman, M., Sillerud, L., and Gottesfeld, S., J. Phys. Chem., 95, 6040 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Ren, X., Zawodzinski, T. A. Jr, Uribe, F., Dai, H. and Gottesfeld, S. in Proton Conducting Membrane Fuel Cells I, Gottesfeld, S., Halpert, G. and Landgrebe, A. eds., The Electrochem. Soc. Inc, Pennington NJ, PV95–23 (1995), p. 284.Google Scholar
4. Narayanan, S.R., Kindler, A., Jeffries-Nakamura, B., Chun, W., Frank, H., Smart, M., Valdez, T.I, Surampudi, S., Kosek, J., and Cropley, C., in “Recent Advances in PEM Liquid Feed Direct Methanol Fuel Cells”, Proceedings of the 11th Annual Battery Conference on Aplications and Advances, Long Beach, CA, Jan. 1996.Google Scholar