Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T05:19:02.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiolytically-Induced Gas Production in Plutonium-Spiked Wipp Brine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

D. T. Reed
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Ave., Argonne, IL 60439
S. Okajima
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Ave., Argonne, IL 60439
L. H. Brush
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
M. A. Molecke
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

Gas generation due to alpha particle deposition was investigated in four WIPP relevant brines; WIPP brine A, ERDA-6, DH-36 and G8-B. This was done by spiking each brine with plutonium-239 and periodically sampling the gas phase to determine the nature of the gaseous products and the rates of gas generation. The predominant gas generated radiolytically was hydrogen, with yields ranging from 0.6 to 1.5 molec/100 eV for the four brines tested. Plutonium (VI) was stable in two synthetic brines, WIPP brine A and ERDA-6 but was rapidly reduced in the underground collected brines DH-36 and G8-B, although most of the plutonium remained in solution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Brush, L. H., “Test Plan for Laboratory and Modeling Studies of Repository and Radionuclide Chemistry for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant,” Sandia National Laboratory (1990).Google Scholar
2. Lappin, A. R. and Hunter, R. L. (eds.), “Systems Analysis, Long-Term Radionuclide Transport, and Dose Assessments, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), Southeastern New Mexico; March 1989,” Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND89-0462 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Molecke, M. A., “Gas Generation from Transuranic Waste Degradation: Data and Summary Interpretation,” Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND79-1245 (1979).Google Scholar
4. Lefort, M., Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 9, 123 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Gray, W. and Simonson, S., “Gamma and Alpha Radiolysis of Salt Brines,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp, Proc. 44 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Jenks, G. H., “Radiolysis and Hydrolysis in Salt-Mine-Brines,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory report ORNL-TM-3717 (1972).Google Scholar
7. Dolle, L. and Rozenberg, J., “Radiolytic Yields in Water Reactor Systems and Influence of Dissolved Hydrogen and Nitrogen,” Water Chemistrv of Nuclear Reactors, British Nuclear Chemistry Society, London, 1977, 291.Google Scholar
8. Jenks, G. H., “Radiolysis and Hydrolysis in Salt-Mine-Brines,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL-TM-3717 (1972).Google Scholar
9. Kim, J. I., Lierse, Ch., Buppelmann, K., and Magirius, S., “Radiolytically Induced Oxidation Reactions of Actinide Ions in Concentrated Salt Solutions,” in Proceedings of the Material Research Socity, Scientific Basis of Nuclear Waste Management X, Vol. 84, 603 (1988).Google Scholar
10. Kim, J. I., Lierse, Ch., Buppelmann, K., and Magirius, S., “Radiolytically Induced Oxidation Reactions of Actinide Ions in Concentrated Salt Solutions,” in Proceedings of the Material Research Society, Scientific Basis of Nuclear Waste Management X, Vol. 84, 603 (1988).Google Scholar