Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T08:36:07.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Relationship between Tensile Strength and Microstructure in Flake Graphite Cast Iron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

R. N. Castillo
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy & Materials Science, Imperial. College, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BP, U.K.
T. J. Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy & Materials Science, Imperial. College, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BP, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

The effects of composition and process variables on the tensile strength of flake graphite cast iron are well established. However, when compared with most metallic materials, there is little quantitative understanding of the way in which the microstructure controls the mechanical properties. In this paper a fracture mechanics approach is used to develop a mechanistic interpretation of the relationship between the microstructure and tensile strength. Flake graphite cast irons have been studied in which matrix microstructures of pearlite, ferrite and tempered martensite have been developed by heat treatment. For a given eutectic cell size, a linear relationship exists between the tensile strength and the fracture toughness KIC, for all of the matrix structures studied. The tensile strength is interpreted as a brittle fracture stress which is determined by the fracture toughness of the iron and an inherent defect size which is defined by the eutectic cell size.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Austin, C.R., American Machinist, 89, 118 (1945).Google Scholar
2. Broek, D., Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2nd edition (Sijthoff and Noordhoff, Netherlands 1978).Google Scholar
3. Glover, A.G. and Pollard, G., Fracture (Chapman and Hall, London 1969) pp. 350.Google Scholar
4. Ruff, G.F. and Wallace, J.F., AFT Trans., 83, 179 (1977).Google Scholar
5. Venkatasubramanian, T.V. and Baker, T.J., Metals Technology, 5, 57 (1978).10.1179/mt.1978.5.1.57Google Scholar
6. Verma, D.K. and Berry, J.T., AFS Trans., 89, 849 (1981).Google Scholar