Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T03:05:10.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Retrievability; Rationale, Measures, Impacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

C. McCombie
Affiliation:
Pangea Resources International, Mellingerstrasse 207, 5405 Baden, SwitzerlandEmail: charles_mccombie@pangearesources.com
P. Zuidema
Affiliation:
Nagra, Hardstrasse 73, 5430 Wettingen, Switzerland, Email: zuidema@nagra.ch
Get access

Abstract

The concept of deep geological disposal was developed in order to permanently remove radioactive wastes from the human environment. Retrieval of wastes was reckoned to be a scenario of such low probability that little effort was initially devoted to its study. In recent years, however, there has been an increasingly active debate on whether fully passive (and safe) systems provide a sufficient level of practicability of retrievability. This debate is linked directly to practical, technical matters, such as the design of the facility, the operating procedures and also the institutional programs throughout the lifetime of a repository. But there are also philosophical issues involved in addition to these purely technical issues.

For retrievability, the questions are: How easy does retrieval have to be in the different stages of repository development? What is the rationale for requiring retrievability? What technical measures and methods are feasible? Should specific features facilitating retrievability be introduced into the repository design? How do such measures impact on other aspects of system performance and on other issues (such as safeguards)? This paper addresses the questions raised and presents a subjective set of conclusions, as a means to stimulate further debate on this topical issue.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.IAEA, 1997: Issues in radioactive waste disposal; 2nd Report of the Working Group on Principles and Criteria for Radioactive Waste Disposal, Chapter 2, p9ff, IAEA-TECDOC-909, IAEA, ViennaGoogle Scholar
2.Euratom, 2000: Concerted action on the retrievability of long-lived radioactive waste in deep underground repositories. Final Report; EU Project report series Nuclear Science and Technology, EUR 19145 EN, 2000Google Scholar
3.IAEA, 1995: “The principles of radioactive waste management”; Safety Series No. 111-F, IAEA, Vienna, 1995 Google Scholar
4.RWMC / OECD-NEA, 1995: The Management of Long-lived Radioactive Waste - The Environmental and Ethical Basis of Geological Disposal - An International Collective Opinion; OECD/NEA 1995 Google Scholar
5.KASAM, 1988: Ethical aspects on nuclear waste - Some salient points discussed at a seminar on ethical action in the face of uncertainty in Stockholm, Sweden, September 1987; Statens Kärnbränsle Nämnd/National Board for Spent Nuclear Fuel, SKN Report 29, April 1988Google Scholar
6. Peterson, P.E., 1998: Post-closure repository safeguards. Comprehensive assessments of excavation methods; Proc. International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management '98, pp735737, 1998 Google Scholar
7.HSK/KSA, 1993: “Protection Objectives for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste”; Regulatory Guideline R-21 of the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (HSK), November 1993 Google Scholar
8.CNE (Commission Nationale d'Evaluation), 1998: Réflexions sur la réversibilité des stockages; CNE Report, Paris, June 1998 Google Scholar
9.EKRA, 2000: “Disposal Concepts for Radioactive Wastes”, Final Report, Expertengruppe Entsorgungskonzepte für radioaktive Abfälle, January 2000 Google Scholar
10.German AKEND, 2000 (web site www.akend.de)Google Scholar