Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T14:41:04.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rock Joint Description and Modelling for Prediction of Near-Field Repository Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Nick Barton ,
Khosrow Bakhtar  and
Stavros Bandis
Nick Barton
Affiliation:
Terra Tek, Inc., 400 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA
Khosrow Bakhtar
Affiliation:
Terra Tek, Inc., 400 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA
Stavros Bandis
Affiliation:
Consultant, 83 Kassandrou St., Thessaloniki, Greece
Get access

Abstract

The shear behavior and normal closure behavior of rock joints have a major influence on the changes in joint conductivity to be expected during the life of a repository. Methods are described for obtaining the joint parameters required to model these conductivity perturbations. They include the joint roughness and the wall strength, which can both be obtained from simple tests on jointed drill core. Examples are shown that illustrate the shear stress-displacement, dilation and conductivity coupling that occurs when a joint of given size is subjected to shear under various levels of effective normal stress. Major increases in conductivity may occur. Examples are also shown that illustrate the stress-closure-conductivity coupling. This comprehensive joint behavior model indicates that important size-effects exist in shear behavior which are related to the joint spacing or effective in situ block size. The discrete modelling of near-field joint and fracture performance is essential for predicting the long-term integrity of a nuclear waste repository.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 26: Symposium D – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII , 1983 , 1047
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bandis, S., 1980, “Experimental Studies of Scale Effects on Shear Strength, and Deformation of Rock Joints,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds, Dept. of Earth Sciences.Google Scholar
2. Bandis, S., Lumsden, A.C., and Barton, N., 1981, “Experimental Studies of Scale Effects on the Shear Behavior of Rock Joints,” Int. J. Rock Mech. Sci. and Geomech. Abstr., Vol. 18, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bandis, S., Lumsden, A.C., and Barton, N., 1983, “Fundamentals of Rock Joint Deformation,” Submitted to Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci.Google Scholar
4. Barton, N., and Choubey, V., 1977, “The Shear Strength of Rock Joints in Theory and Practice,” Rock Mechanics, Vol. 10, pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
5. Barton, N., 1982, “Modelling Rock Joint Behavior from In-Situ Block Tests: Implications for Nuclar Waste Repository Design,” Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Columbus, OH, 96 p., ONWI-308, September 1982.Google Scholar
6. Barton, N. and Bandis, S., 1982, “Effects of Block Size on the Shear Behavior of Jointed Rock,” Keynote Lecture, 23rd U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
7. Barton, N. and Lingle, R., 1982, “Rock Mass Characterization Methods for Nuclear Waste Repositories in Jointed Rock,” ISRM Symposium, “Rock Mechanics, Caverns and Pressure Shafts,” Aachen. A.A. Balkema, 1982.Google Scholar
8. Barton, N. and Bakhtar, K., 1983, “Rock Joint Description and Modelling for the Hydrothermomechanical Design of Nuclear Waste Repositories,” CANMET Mining Research Laboratories, Terra Tek Report TRE 8310.Google Scholar
9. Maini, T. and Hocking, G., 1977, “An Examination of the Feasibility of Hydrologic Isolation of a High Level Waste Repository in Crystalline Rock,” Geologic Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste Session, Annual Meeting of the Geological Society of America, held in Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
10. Miller, R.P., 1965, “Engineering Classification and Index Properties for Intact Rock,” Thesis, University of Illinois, 332 pp.Google Scholar
11. Pratt, H.R., Black, A.D., and Brace, W.F., 1974, “Friction and Deformation of Jointed Quartz Diorite,” Proc. of the 3rd Intl. Cong. on Rock Mech., held in Denver, CO, Vol. 2A, pp. 306–310.Google Scholar
12. Witherspoon, P.A., Wang, J.S.Y., Iwai, K. and Gale, J.E., 1979, “Validity of Cubic Law for Fluid Flow in a Deformable Rock Fracture,” Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, LBL-9557, SAC-23, 28 p.Google Scholar