Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T08:34:02.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Barium In the Heteroepitaxial Growth of Insulator and Semiconductors On Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

T. K. Chu
Affiliation:
Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division, White Oak Laboratory, 10901 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20903, USA
F. Santiago
Affiliation:
Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division, White Oak Laboratory, 10901 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20903, USA
M. Stumborg
Affiliation:
AlsoThe Catholic University, Washington, DC 20064, USA
C. A. Huber
Affiliation:
Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division, White Oak Laboratory, 10901 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20903, USA
Get access

Abstract

The epitaxial growth of an insulator, BaF2, and semiconductors of the II-VI and the IV-VI families on Si substrates were carried out. In-situ XPS analyses during the growth of the first monolayers were used to study the surface chemical reactions involved. The results point to a common ingredient in these growths: that the Ba atoms are involved in forming interfacial compounds that would facilitate the heteroepitaxies. In the case of BaF2/Si, a BaSi2 compound has been identified previously. In the case of PbTe and CdTe, the heteroepitaxies on Si are made possible with the BaSi2 buffer. As a result, the impinging semiconductor molecules are broken up, and the metallic elements are ejected from the BaSi2 surface. A new surface chemical, BaTe, is thereby formed. These surface Ba compounds appear to be the dominant factors as the crystal orientations of the BaF2, CdTe, and PbTe layers are independent of those of the Si substrates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

1. Schowalter, L. J., CRC Critical Rev. Sol. State and Mat. Sci. 15(4) 367 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chu, T. K. et al. , Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 221 483 (1991), and F. Santiago, D. Woody, T. K. Chu, and C. Huber, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 281 603 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Asano, T., Ishiwara, H., and Kaifu, N., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 22 1474 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Taylor, A. P., Li, W., Xiao, Q.-F., and Schowater, L. J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 222 537 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Santiago, F., Ph. D. Thesis, the American University, 1992.Google Scholar
6. The identification of this interface compound was done by an analysis of the Si XPS signal by the same method used by Feldman, L. G. and Mayer, J. W., Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis (Elsevier, New York, 1986), Chapter 5, P. 125. Details of this analysis and of the determination of the BaF2 /BaSi 2 /Si layer structure will be published elsewhere.Google Scholar
7. Chu, T. K, Santiago, F., and Huber, C. A., Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division Technical Digest Vol. 4, Materials, 98 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Schaefer, H., Janzon, K. H., and Weiss, A., Angew. Chem. Intemat. Edit. 2 393 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hansen, M. and Anderko, K., Constituion of Binary Alloys, (McGraw Hill, New York, 1958).Google Scholar
10. for example, Himpsel, F. J. et al. , Appl. Phys. Lett. 48 596 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. McCann, P. J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 221 289 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 4th Ed., P. F- 117, (The Chemical Rubber Co., 1965).Google Scholar
13. Evers, J., Oehlinger, G., and Weiss, A., Angew. Chem. Internt. Edit. Engl. 16 659 (1977).Google Scholar