Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T03:26:42.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of the Epitaxy Relations in the CoCrPt Thin Films with Bilayer V/Cr Underlayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Pawel Glijer
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science
John M Sivertsen
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access

Abstract

The effects of grain-to-grain epitaxy conditions on the magnetic properties of high coercivity CoCr13Pt13 films with bilayer Cr/Cr, V/Cr and V/V underlayers were studied. V/Cr films were used in order to obtain underlayers that would differ from Cr only by a size of the lattice constant. Introduction of V instead of Cr as an underlayer changed the relative misfits between CoCrPt and the underlayer lattice and increased the amount of {0002} texture in the magnetic film. This effect led to a decrease in the in-plane coercivity. CoCrPt/V/Cr and CoCrPt/Cr/Cr films exhibited similar texture of the underlayer, the same microstructure and similar level of internal stress. Correspondingly the decrease in coercivity did not exceed 10% (from 2.7 kOe to 2.5 kOe). On the other hand CoCrPt/V/V film had more than 4 times smaller coercivity (0.6 kOe). In this case, change in the magnetic properties was caused not only by altered misfits but also by the change in microstructure, texture and state of stress in the film. Results obtained indicate that small changes in misfits between a magnetic layer and an underlayer can be effectively used to control coercivity only if other structural parameters remain unchanged.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Laughlin, D.E., Wong, B.Y., IEEE Trans. Mag., 27, 4713 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Howard, J.K., Ahlert, R., Lim, G., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 5579 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Howard, J.K., U.S. Patent No. 4, 652, 499 (24 March 1987).Google Scholar
4. Nguyen, T.A., Howard, J.K., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 5579 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Hsu, Y., Chen, Q., Johnson, K.E., Sivertsen, J.M., J.H. Judy in Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Magnetic Materials, Processes, and Devices, edited by Romankiw, L.T. and Herman, D. A., The Electrochemical Society Inc., 95, (1991).Google Scholar
6. Parker, M.A., Howard, J.K., Ahlert, R., Coffey, K.R., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 5560 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Beardsley, I.A., Zhu, J.-G., IEEE Trans. Mag., 27, 5037 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Cullity, B.D., Elements of X-ray Diffraction. 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1978) p. 506.Google Scholar
9. Reference manual for Nanoscope III, ver. 2.5, Digital Instruments Inc, 6780 Cartona Drv., Santa Barbara, CA 93117.Google Scholar
10. van der Merwe, J.H., Waltersdorf, J., Jesser, W.A., J. Mat. Sci. Eng. 81, 1 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Ranjan, R., Chang, J., Yamashita, T., Chen, T., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 5542 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar