Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:04:23.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-Catalytic Branch Growth of SnO2Nanowire Junctions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Y. X. Chen
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Research Institute, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148.
L. J. Campbell
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Research Institute, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148.
W. L. Zhou
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Research Institute, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148.
Get access

Abstract

Multiple branched SnO2 nanowire junctions have been synthesized by thermal evaporation of SnO powder. Their nanostructures were studied by transmission electron microscopy and field emission scanning electron microcopy. It was observed that Sn nanoparticles generated from decomposition of the SnO powder acted as self-catalysts to control the SnO2 nanojunction growth. Orthorhombic SnO2 was found as a dominate phase in nanojunction growth instead of rutile structure. The branches and stems of nanojunctions were found to be an epitaxial growth by electron diffraction analysis and high resolution electron microscopy observation. The growth directions of the branched SnO2 nanojunctions were along the orthorhombic [110] and [1 1 0]. The growth of SnO2 nanojunction is controlled by a self-catalytic vapor-liquid-solid growth using Sn nanoparticle catalysts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gudlksen, M.S., Lauhon, L.J., Wang, J.F., Smith, D.V., and Lieber, C.M., Nature 415, 617 (2002).Google Scholar
2. Liu, C.H., Yin, W.C., Au, F.C.K., Ding, J.X., Lee, C.S., and Lee, S.T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 3168 (2003).Google Scholar
3. Ting, J.M. and Chang, C.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 324 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Gao, P.X., Wang, Z.L., J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 12653 (2002).Google Scholar
5. Lao, J.Y., Huang, J.Y., Wang, D.Z., and Ren, Z.F., Nano Lett. 3, 235 (2003).Google Scholar
6. Lao, J.Y., Wen, J.G., and Ren, Z.F., Nano Lett. 2, 1287 (2002).Google Scholar
7. Shimizu, Y. and Egashira, M., MRS Bull. 24, 18 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Williams, G., and Coles, G.S.V., MRS Bull. 24, 25(1999).Google Scholar
9. Tatsuyama, C., Ichimura, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 15, 843 (1976).Google Scholar
10. Dai, Z.R., Gole, J.L., Stout, J.D., and Wang, Z.L., J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 1274 (2002).Google Scholar
11. Nguyen, P., Ng, H.T., Kong, J., Cassell, A.M., Quinn, R., Li, J., Han, J., McNeil, M., and Meyyappan, M., Nano Lett. 3, 925 (2003).Google Scholar
12. Chen, Y.Q., Cui, X.F., Zhang, K., Pan, D.Y., Zhang, S.Y., Wang, B., Hou, J.G., Chem. Phys. Lett. 369, 16 (2003).Google Scholar
13. Pan, Z.W., Dar, Z.R., Wang, Z.L., Science 291, 1947 (2001).Google Scholar
14. Dean, J.A., Lange's handbook of Chemistry, 11th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1973.Google Scholar
15. In preparation.Google Scholar
16. Baou, W.H., Acta Crystallogr. 9, 515 (1956).Google Scholar
17. Suito, K., Kawai, N., Masuda, Y., Mater. Res. Bull. 10, 677 (1975).Google Scholar
18. Moreno, M.S., Mercader, R.C., and Bibiloni, A.G., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 4, 351 (1992).Google Scholar