Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T00:24:59.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simultaneous Relaxation of Network and Defects in Silicon-Implanted a-Si:H*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. Nakata
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 On leave from Department of Electrical Engineering, Kinki University, Higashiosaka, Osaka 577, Japan
S. Sherman
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
S. Wagner
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
P. A. Stolk
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
J. M. Poate
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Get access

Abstract

We report extensive optical and electronic transport data on silicon-implanted a-Si:H, annealed in steps in the dark or with additional illumination. All measured properties relax gradually with increasing annealing temperature. The dark conductivity of the as-implanted film is dominated by hopping conduction via midgap defects. This channel is pinched off during the initial stages of annealing. The midgap defect density and the Urbach energy follow an annealing path that agrees qualitatively with the trajectory postulated by the equilibrium theory of the dangling-bond density. Therefore, the silicon network and the defect density equilibrate continuously during network relaxation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We dedicate this paper to the memory of the late Professor Yoshio Inuishi of Kinki University

References

REFERENCES

1. Smith, Z.E., Aljishi, S., Slobodin, D.E., Chu, V., Wagner, S., Lenahan, P.M., Arya, R.R. and Bennett, M.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2450 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Bar-Yam, Y., Adler, D. and Joannopoulos, J.D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 467 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Smith, Z. E. and Wagner, S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 688 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Stutzmann, M., Phil. Mag. B 60, 531 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Street, R.A. and Winer, K., Phys. Rev. B 40, 6236 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Roorda, S., Sinke, W.C., Poate, J.M., Jacobson, D.C., Dierker, S., Dennis, B.S., Eaglesham, D.J., Spaepen, F. and Fuoss, P., Phys. Rev. B 44, 3702 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Stoik, P.A., Saris, F.W., Beratsen, A.J.M., van der Weg, W.F., Sealy, L.T., Barklie, R.C., Krötz, G. and Müller, G., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 7266 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Zammit, U., Madhusoodanan, K.N., Marinelli, M., Scudieri, F., Pizzoferrato, R., Mercuri, F., Wendler, E. and Wesch, W., Phys. Rev. B 49, 14322 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Berntsen, A.J.M., PhD thesis, University of Utrecht, 1993.Google Scholar
10. Slobodin, D., Aljishi, S., Schwarz, R. and Wagner, S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 49, 153 (1985).Google Scholar
11. Gleskova, H., Morin, P.A. and Wagner, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 2063 (1993).Google Scholar