Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:57:11.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Aspects of Plastic Flow in Silicon Nitride

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T. Rouxel
Affiliation:
Laboratoire “Verres et Céramiques”, UMR-CNRS 6512, Université de Rennes 1, Campus Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes cedex, France
J. Rabier
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de métallurgie physique, URA-CNRS 131, Université de Poitiers, Bd. 3 Téléport 2 BP 179, 86960 Futuroscope cedex, France
S. Testu
Affiliation:
ENSCI, SPCTS, UMR-CNRS 6638,47 Av. A. Thomas, 87065 Limoges cedex, France
X. Milhet
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de métallurgie physique, URA-CNRS 131, Université de Poitiers, Bd. 3 Téléport 2 BP 179, 86960 Futuroscope cedex, France
Get access

Abstract

The different scales of plastic flow in silicon nitride were investigated either by indentation experiments and compression under hydrostatic pressure in the 20-850°C temperature range, and by stress relaxation and creep above 1350°C. [0001], 1/3<11-20> and 1/3<11-23> dislocations were evidenced by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) in the low temperature range. Cross-slip events in {10-10} prismatic planes were observed at temperature as low as 20°C by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) on micro-hardness indents. By increasing the temperature, the deviation plane becomes {11-20} prismatic planes. The easiest slip system is by far the [0001]{10-10} system. Above 1350°C, the creep strain could be fitted by the sum of a transient component, εt[1-exp-(t/τc)bc], where τc reflects the duration of the transient creep stage, and bc is between 0 and 1, and a stationary component, εsst =Aσnt, where σ is the stress and n is the stress exponent. The increase of ε with temperature is interpreted on the basis of the formation of liquid intergranulary phases above 1400°C by progressive melting of some of the grains. A creep exponent of 1.8 was determined. A single value could hardly be given to the activation energy since an S-shape curve was observed in the In εs versus l/T plot, as for most glasses over large temperature ranges. The stress relaxation kinetics was found to follow the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watt expression: σ/σo=exp [-(t/τr)br], where br ranges between 0 (solid state) and I (liquid state) and τr is a characteristic relaxation time constant. As in the case of glasses, τr decreases rapidly whereas br increases from about 0.2 to 0.7 as the temperature increases from 1400 to 1650°C. But again, it is very difficult to get a single value for the activation energy from the In τr versus 1/T plot.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Milhet, X., Garem, H., Demenet, J-L., Rabier, J. and Rouxel, T., J. Mat. Sci. 31, p. 37333738 (1997).10.1023/A:1018659203552Google Scholar
2. Milhet, X., Demenet, J-L. and Rabier, J., Phil. Mag. Lett. 79, p. 19 (1999).10.1080/095008399177615Google Scholar
3. Milhet, X., Doctorate thesis, University of Poitiers (France), January 1999.Google Scholar
4. Kawahara, K., Tsurekawa, S. and Nakashima, H., in Key Engineering Materials Vols. 171–174, p. 825832 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Testu, S., Doctorate thesis, Limoges (France), November 1999.Google Scholar
6. Bernard-Granger, G., Crampon, J., Duclos, R. and Cales, B., J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. 17, 16471654 (1997).10.1016/S0955-2219(97)00008-3Google Scholar
7. Kohlrausch, R., Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 12, p. 393 (1887). See also: “Fundamentals of inorganic glasses”, Ed. Varshneya, A.K., Pub. Academic Press Inc. (Boston, San-Diego, New-York, London, 1994).Google Scholar
8. Perez, J., Cavaillé, J.Y., Etienne, S. and Jourdan, C., “Physical interpretation of the rheological behavior of amorphous polymers through the glass transition”, Revue Phys. Appl. 23, 125135 (1988).10.1051/rphysap:01988002302012500Google Scholar
9. Rouxel, T. and Wakai, F., Acta metall. mater. 41, 11, p. 32033213 (1993).10.1016/0956-7151(93)90050-3Google Scholar
10. Rouxel, T., Rossignol, F., Besson, J-L. and Goursat, P., J. Mater. Res. 12, 2, p.480492 (1997).10.1557/JMR.1997.0070Google Scholar
11. Lemercier, H.., Rouxel, T.., Fargeot, D., Besson, J-L. and Piriou, B., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 201, 128145 (1996).10.1016/0022-3093(96)00147-0Google Scholar
12. Wakai, F., Kodama, Y., Sakaguchi, S., Murayama, N., Izaki, K. and Niihara, K., Lett. to Nature 344, p. 421 (1990).10.1038/344421a0Google Scholar