Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:59:19.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Specialized Disposal Sites for Different Reprocessing Plant Wastes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2011

Charles W. Forsberg  and
Michael J. Driscoll
Charles W. Forsberg
Affiliation:
forsbergcw@ornl.gov, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Nuclear Science and Technology Division, P. O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831-6165, United States, 865-574-6783
Michael J. Driscoll
Affiliation:
mickeyd@mit.edu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Nuclear Science and Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02139, United States
Get access

Abstract

Once-through fuel cycles directly dispose of one primary waste form: spent nuclear fuel (SNF). In contrast, the reprocessed SNF yields multiple waste streams with different chemical, physical, and radionuclide characteristics. These different characteristics of each waste stream imply that there are potential cost and performance benefits to developing different disposal sites that best match the disposal requirements of each waste stream. Disposal sites as defined herein may be located in different geologies or in a single repository containing multiple sections, each with different design characteristics. The paper describes the results of a series of studies on disposal options for specific wastes and the potential for a waste management system that better couples various reprocessing plant wastes with disposal facilities.

Keywords

waste managementactinideCs
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 985: Symposium NN – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXX , 2006 , 0985-NN13-11
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Forsberg, C. W., Nucl. Tech. 131 (2), 252–268 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Evaluation of a Spent Fuel Repository At Yucca Mountain, Nevada: 2005 Progress Report, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), 1010074 (2005).Google Scholar
3. Carlsson, J., Radwaste Magazine 5(6), 25 (November.December 1998).Google Scholar
4. Croff, A. G., Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Restoration 18(3), 155–180 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Kawasaki, D., Ahn, J., Chambre, P. L., and Halsey, W. G., Nucl. Tech. 148, 181–193, (2004).Google Scholar
6. Ahn, J., Kawasaki, D., and Chambre, P. L., Nucl. Tech., 140, 94–112 (2002).Google Scholar
7. Gibb, F. G. F. and Attrill, P. G., Geology 31, (8), 657–660 (2003).Google Scholar
8. Deep Borehole Disposal Facility PEIS Data Input Report for Immobilized Disposal, UCRL-ID-119735, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore California.Google Scholar
9. Deep Borehole Disposal Facility PEIS Data Input Report for Direct Disposal, UCRL-ID-119481, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, April 1995.Google Scholar
10. Sizer, C. G., Minor Actinide Waste Disposal in Deep Geological Boreholes, Department of Nuclear Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, May 19, 2006.Google Scholar
11. Forsberg, C. W., Nuc. Tech. 101, 40–53, January 1993.Google Scholar
12. Feasibility of Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste into the Seabed, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 1988.Google Scholar
13. NAGRA Bulletin, 35, National Cooperative for Disposal of Radioactive Waste, Wettingen, Switzerland, May 2004.Google Scholar