Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T07:22:28.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Damage During Kev Ion Irradiation: Results of Computer Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

R.S. Averback
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Mai Ghaly
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Huilong Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Get access

Abstract

MD simulations have been employed to investigate damage processes near surfaces during keV bombardment of metal targets. For self-ion implantation of au, Cu, and Pt in the range of 5-20 keV, we have found that the proximity of the surface leads to significantly more damage and atomic mixing in comparison to recoil events occurring in the crystal interior. IN some cases, large craters are formed in a micro-explosive event, while in others a convective flow of atoms to the surface creates adatoms and leaves dislocations behind. Both the amount damage created in the surface and its morphology depend sensitively on the details of the energy deposition along individual ion trajectories. the results of these simulations will be summarized and compared to recent scanning tunneling microscopy studies of individual ion impacts in Pt and Ge.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gibson, J.B., Goland, A.N., Milgram, M., and Vineyard, G.H., Phys. Rev. 120, 1229 (1960).Google Scholar
2 Robinson, M.T. and Torrens, I.M., Phys. Rev. B 2, 5008 (1974).Google Scholar
3 Biersack, J.P. and Haggmark, L.G., Nucl. INstr. and Meth. B 174 257 (1980).Google Scholar
4 See e.g., Sigmund, P., in Sputtering by Particle Bombardment, ed. Behrisch, R., (SpringerVerlag, Berlin, 1981) Chapter 1.Google Scholar
5 See e.g., Averback, R.S., Diaz, T. de la Rubia and Benedek, R., Nucl. INstr. Meth. B 33, 693 (1988).Google Scholar
6 Zhu, H., Averback, R.S., and Nastasi, M., Philos. Mag. A 71, 735 (1995).Google Scholar
7 Bacon, D. and Diaz de la Rubia, T., J. Nucl. Mater. 216, 275 (1994).Google Scholar
8 Diaz de la Rubia, T. and Gilmer, G.H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2507 (1995).Google Scholar
9 See e.g., Sigmund, P. and Claussen, C., J. appl. Phys. 52, 355 (1981).Google Scholar
10 Ghaly, M. and Averback, R.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 364 (1994).Google Scholar
11 MOLDYCASK is a derivative of MOLDY, see Finnis, M.W., atomic Energy authority Report No. aERE-R-13182, (1988).Google Scholar
12 Ghaly, M., thesis, Ph.D., University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, (1995).Google Scholar
13 Daw, M.S. and Baskes, M.I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1285 (1983).Google Scholar
14 Foiles, S.M., Baskes, M.I., and Daw, M.S., Phys. Rev. B 33, 7983 (1986).Google Scholar
15 Ziegler, J., Biersack, J.P., and Littmark, U., in Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids, (Pergamon Press, New York, 1985) Vol. 1.Google Scholar
16 See e.g., Harrison, D., Radiat. Effs. 70, 1 (1983).Google Scholar
17 Trinkaus, H. and Ryazanov, A.I., Phys. Rev. Lett. (in press).Google Scholar
18 Averback, R.S. and Ghaly, Mai, J. appl. Phys. 76, 3908 (1994).Google Scholar
19 Teichert, C., Hohage, M., Michely, Th., and Comsa, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1682 (1994).Google Scholar
20 Merkle, K.L. and Jager, W., Philos Mag. A. 44, 741 (1981)Google Scholar
21 Bellon, P., Chey, S.J., Van Nostrand, E., Mai, Ghaly, Cahill, D.G., and Averback, R.S., Surf. Sci. (in press).348 Google Scholar