Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T02:54:38.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Stability of Siderite Under Acidic Atmosphere: an Atomic Force Microscopy Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

R. M. Weaver
Affiliation:
Geology Dept., Temple University, 306 Beury Hall, Norris St., Philadelphia, PA 19122, rweave00@nimbus.ocis.temple, grand@vm.temple.edu, gmyer@nimbus.ocis.temple.edu
D. E. Grandstaff
Affiliation:
Geology Dept., Temple University, 306 Beury Hall, Norris St., Philadelphia, PA 19122, rweave00@nimbus.ocis.temple, grand@vm.temple.edu, gmyer@nimbus.ocis.temple.edu
G. H. Myer
Affiliation:
Geology Dept., Temple University, 306 Beury Hall, Norris St., Philadelphia, PA 19122, rweave00@nimbus.ocis.temple, grand@vm.temple.edu, gmyer@nimbus.ocis.temple.edu
Get access

Abstract

The reactivity of siderite (FeCO3) was investigated under ambient atmosphere and acidic aerosols using an atomic force microscope (AFM). Scans of freshly cleaved siderite crystals showed a relatively irregular microtopography, consisting of high-density kink-steps, compared to other isostructural carbonates (e.g. Iceland-spar calcite). Under ambient conditions siderite is inert with no spontaneous surface reconstruction as is reported for calcite. Under controlled conditions of pH and humidity, siderite was exposed to mists of HC1 and H2CO3 and the reaction was imaged with submicron resolution. The kinetics of the reaction varied with pH, humidity levels, and also as a function of the initial microtopography. Preferential growth and dissolution were observed as a function of initial topography and due to crystallographic anisotropies. Although extreme reaction conditions were excluded by certain aspects of AFM (high capillary forces, tip corrosion, charged surface), this technique has allowed real-time, in situ observations of surface reactions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dreybrodt, W., Lauckner, J., Zaihua, L., Svensson, U. and Buhmann, D., Geochim. Cosmochim Acta 60, 3375 (1996).Google Scholar
2. Wersin, P., Charlet, L., Karthein, R. and Stumm, W., Geochim. Cosmochim Acta 53, 2787 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Charlet, L., Wersin, P., Stumm, W., Geochim. Cosmochim Acta 54, 2329 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Van Cappellen, P., Charlet, L., Stumm, W. and Wersin, P., Geochim. Cosmochim Acta 57, 3505 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Chiarello, R.P., Wogelius, R.A. and Sturchio, N.C., Geochim. Cosmochim Acta 57, 4103 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Stipp, S.L.S., Gutemannsbauer, W. and Lehmann, T., American Mineralogist, 81, 1 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Stipp, S.L.S. and Hochella, M.F., Geochim. Cosmochim Acta 55, 1723 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Stipp, S.L.S., Eggleston, C.M. and Neilsen, B.S., Geochim. Cosmochim Acta 58, 3023 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Hillner, P.E., Gratz, A.J., Manne, S. and Hansma, P.K., Geology, 20, 359 (1992).Google Scholar