Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:29:29.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal Conductivity Measurements of Interlevel Dielectrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Elizabeth B. Varner
Affiliation:
Components Research, Intel Corporation, SC4–113, 2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95052–8119, lise_varner@ccm.sc.intel.com
Thomas Marieb
Affiliation:
Components Research, Intel Corporation, SC1–03, 3065 Bowers Ave., Santa Clara, CA 95052–8119
Anne Sauter Mack
Affiliation:
Components Research, Intel Corporation, SC1–03, 3065 Bowers Ave., Santa Clara, CA 95052–8119
Jin Lee
Affiliation:
Components Research, Intel Corporation, SC1–03, 3065 Bowers Ave., Santa Clara, CA 95052–8119
William K. Meyer
Affiliation:
Components Technology Development Quality and Reliability, Intel Corporation, RAI-329, 2501 Northwest 229th Street, Hillsboro, OR 97124–5503
Kenneth E. Goodson
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Mail Stop 3030, Stanford, CA 94305–3030
Get access

Abstract

The thermal conductivity of interlevel dielectrics (ILD) in interconnect structures is an important parameter in determining the temperature rise in the interconnects during use. Numerous researchers have previously shown that the thermal conductivity of thin film dielectrics can be significantly lower than that of bulk materials. As new materials, such as low-dielectric constant materials, are considered for use as ILD's, methods are needed for measuring the thermal conductivity of the these materials to determine whether they can adequately conduct heat away from interconnect lines. Many methods reported in the literature use patterned metal lines atop the dielectric on a Si substrate as combination Joule heaters and temperature sensors, and extract the thermal conductivity from a model of heat conduction through the dielectric to the substrate. One drawback of these methods is the lack of agreement of the conductivity determined from the different techniques. For example, a thermal conductivity ranging from 0.6 to 1.4 W/m-K was calculated for a 1.25 μm thick PTEOS oxide using five different methods on the same test structure. In this paper we present a unique combination of test structures, experimental methods, and heat conduction models that highlight the limitations of some of the models and methods. We also show good agreement in the thermal conductivity determined from both an experimental method and a finite element model, and suggest that these two techniques yield an accurate measure of the thermal conductivity of thin film dielectrics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Goodson, K. E., Flik, M. I., Su, L. T., and Antoniadis, D. A., Journal of Heat Transfer 116, p. 317324 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Shirley, C. G., J. Appl. Phys. 57, p. 777784 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Goodson, K. E., “Thermal conduction in microelectronic circuits,” Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar
4. Gao, H., Stanford University, 1997 (unpublished).Google Scholar
5. Yuan, C. P. and Trick, T. N., IEEE Electron Device Letters EDL-3, No. 12 (1982) 391393.Google Scholar
6. LIBRA finite element program, Structural Mechanics Analysis, Inc.Google Scholar