Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T04:38:26.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermodynamics of Segregation in Multi-Component Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Krishan L. Luthra  and
Clyde L. Briant
Krishan L. Luthra
Affiliation:
Corporate Research and Development, General Electric Company, P.O. Box 8, Schenectady, NY 12301
Clyde L. Briant
Affiliation:
Corporate Research and Development, General Electric Company, P.O. Box 8, Schenectady, NY 12301
Get access

Abstract

Thermodynamic equations are developed to express segregation in multicomponent alloys. These equations use concepts of excess partial free energies and activity coefficients and can be used in a wide variety of situations, including those where the segregating elements, such as sulfur, form strong chemical compounds in the bulk. A lower surface tension of the segregating element in relation to that of the alloy promotes its segregation. The segregation factor is also directly related to the activity/activity coefficient of the segregating element. The validity of our equations is checked by comparing the results of calculated segregation factors with the published values on sulfur segregation in Ni-S, Cr-S, Al-S, and Y-S alloys and on lead segregation in Pb-In and Pb-Sn alloys.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 122: Symposium I – Interfacial Structure, Properties, and Design , 1988 , 249
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Defay, R., Prigogine, I., and Bellemans, A., “Surface Tension and Absorption,” Translated by Everett, D.H., Chapter 12, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1966, p. 159.Google Scholar
2. Overbury, S.H., Bertrand, P.A., and Somorjai, G.A., Chemical Reviews, 75 (5), 547 (1975).Google Scholar
3. Miedema, A.R., Z. Metallk, 69, 455 (1978).Google Scholar
4. Miedema, A.R., Z. Metallk, 69, 287 (1978).Google Scholar
5. Abraham, F.F. and Brundle, C.R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 18, 506 (1981).Google Scholar
6. Mezey, L.Z. and Giber, J., Surface Science, 117, 220 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Kumar, V., Phys. Rev. B, 23, 3756 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Guttman, M., Surface Science, 53, 213 (1975).Google Scholar
9. Luthra, K.L. and Briant, C.L., Met. Trans. A, 19A, (1988), in print.Google Scholar
10. Briant, C.L. and Luthra, K.L., Met. Trans. A, 19A, (1988), in print.Google Scholar
11. Barnard, J.A., Wynblatt, P., Johnson, W.C., and Mullins, W.W., Surface Science, 183, 134 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Miedema, A.R. and Boom, R., Z. Metallkunde, 69, 183 (1978).Google Scholar
13. Hultgren, R., Desai, P.D., Hawkins, D.T., Gleiser, M., and Kelley, K.K., “Selected Values of the Thermodynamic Properties of Binary Alloys,” American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1973.Google Scholar