Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T05:04:48.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermodynamics of Wetting by Liquid Metals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

F. G. Yost
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185
A. D. Romig Jr.
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

The wetting of metal surfaces by molten solder is usually considered to be driven solely by an interfacial energy imbalance. The effect of chemical reactions on the wetting process is neglected, although the growth of an intermetallic layer in the wetted interface is commonly observed. In this work, the energy release during the incremental advance of a spreading solder droplet due to the interfacial energy imbalance and the formation of the intermetallic layer is calculated. The free energy of formation, ΔG, of the intermetallic layer is shown to be an important driving force for solder wetting.

This approach to wetting has been applied to three systems, Cu-Sn, Cu-Sb and Cu-Cd. Liquid Sn, Sb and Cd react with solid Cu to form Cu6Sn5 (η), Cu2Sb (γ) and CuCd3 (ε), respectively. The free energy of formation, ΔG, for these intermetallic compounds is unknown experimentally, but can be calculated from the phase diagrams and other solution data using classical thermodynamics. These thermochemical calculations yield ΔG(η) = 465–3.09T for Cu-Sn, ΔG(γ) = −2500+0.54T for Cu-Sb and ΔG(ε) = −825+0.44T for Cu-Cd (cal/mole). These relations were evaluated at the respective melting temperatures and compared with the interfacial energy exchange. In all three cases the ΔG contribution was approximately two orders of magnitude larger than the interfacial energy exchange making it the dominant driving force for wetting kinetics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Young, T., Trans. R. Soc., London 94, 65 (1805).Google Scholar
2.Naidich, J. V., Prog. Surf. and Memb. Sci. 14 353 (1981).Google Scholar
3.deGennes, P. G., Rev. Mod. Phys. 57(3), 827 (1985).Google Scholar
4.Delannay, F., Froyen, L. and Deruyttere, A., J. Mater. Sci. 22, 1 (1987).Google Scholar
5.Hultgren, R., Desai, P. D., Hawkins, D. T., Gleiser, M. and Kelley, K. K., Selected Values of the Thermodynamic Properties of Binary Alloys, (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1973), p. 566, 746, 795.Google Scholar
6.Bailey, G. L. J. and Watkins, H. C., J. Inst. Metals 80, 57 (19511952).Google Scholar
7.Wassink, R. J. Klein, J. Inst. Metals 95, 38 (1967).Google Scholar
8.Kubaschewski, O., Evans, E. L. and Alcock, C. B., Metallurgical Thermochemistry, (Pergamon Press, New York, 1967), p. 366.Google Scholar
9.Murr, L. E., Interfacial Phenomena in Metals and Alloys, (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts, 1975), p. 101106.Google Scholar