Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T02:59:22.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toughness and Contact Behavior of Conventional and Low-k Dielectric Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Robert F. Cook ,
Dylan J. Morris  and
Jeremy Thurn
Robert F. Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, U.S.A.
Dylan J. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, U.S.A.
Jeremy Thurn
Affiliation:
Advanced Mechanical Technology, Seagate Technology Bloomington, MN, 55435, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

A comprehensive indentation fracture mechanics framework is established that allows the fracture properties of thin films to be determined. The framework is composed of four stress-intensity factors characterizing the stress fields arising from (i) elastic contact, (ii) wedging, (iii) residual elastic-plastic mismatch and (iv) pre-existing film stress. The amplitudes of the stress-intensity factors depend on the deformation properties of the film and vary throughout the indentation cycle. The toughness values of a PVD alumina, for which (iii) and (iv) are dominant, and a low-k film, for which (i), (ii) and (iv) are dominant, are evaluated.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 795: Symposium U – Thin Films - Stresses and Mechanical Properties X , 2003 , U4.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tabor, D., The Hardness of Metals, (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1951)Google Scholar
2. Anstis, G.R., Chantikul, P., Lawn, B.R. and Marshall, D.B., J. Amer. Cer. Soc. 64, 533 (1981)Google Scholar
3. Cook, R.F. and Pharr, G.M., J. Amer. Cer. Soc. 73, 787 (1990)Google Scholar
4. Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992)Google Scholar
5. Cook, R.F. and Liniger, E.G., J. Electrochem. Soc. 146, 4439 (1999)Google Scholar
6. Lawn, B.R., Evans, A.G. and Marshall, D.B., J. Amer. Cer. Soc. 63, 574 (1980)Google Scholar
7. Morris, D.J. and Cook, R.F., in Materials, Technology and Reliability for Advanced Interconnects and Low-k Dielectrics eds McKerrow, A., Leu, J., Kraft, O. and Kikkawa, T., MRS Proceedings Volume 766 Pittsburgh, PA (2003) pp. E9.3.1–6 Google Scholar
8. Marshall, D.B., Lawn, B.R. and Evans, A.G., J. Amer. Cer. Soc. 65, 561 (1982)Google Scholar
9. Cook, R.F., J. Amer. Cer. Soc. 77, 1263 (1994)Google Scholar
10. Thouless, M.D., Acta Metall. 36, 3131 (1988)Google Scholar
11. Lawn, B.R., Fracture of Brittle Solids, (Cambridge University Press, 2nd Edition, Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar
12. Beuth, J.L. Jr, Int. J. Solids Structures 29, 1657 (1992)Google Scholar