Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T00:38:55.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultrasonic Computed Tomography for Imaging Bones and Adjoining Soft Tissues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

C. M. Sehgal
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
J. F. Greenleaf
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology & Biophysics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
Get access

Extract

The skeletal system of bones and cartilage forms a framework that supports and protects soft tissues. It also provides surfaces to which muscles, ligaments and tendons attach and coordinate movement of bones. Since such musculoskeletal system serves as a “structural” element of the body it is easy to see that its functional capabilities are closely related to it mechanical strength. Consequently, there have been numerous attempts to characterize the properties of bones. Currently, several sophisticated diagnostic procedures and radiographic imaging techniques are available for quantitative purposes. Virtually all the available methods are based on the measurement of mineral content of the bone. It is well known that it is the combination of the organic and the inorganic components that determine the strength of the bones. Thus, in principle, the traditional methods can provide only part of the information about the bone tissues. With this shortcoming in view an effective case can be made for the development of a technique that measures both the components. Many researchers have looked at ultrasonic energy to fulfill this role. The rationale for the choice of this energy is that ultrasound is a “mechanical radiation” and its propagating properties provide a direct measure of mechanical strength or related property of the medium.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Anst, G.T., Fields, T. and Siegel., I.M. Ultrasonic technique for the evaluation of bone fractures, Amer. J. Phys. Med. 37:157 (1958).Google Scholar
2. Heaney, R.P., Avioli, L.V., Chestnut, C.H. III, Lappe, J., Recker, R.R., and Brandenburger., G. H. JAMA, Vol.261:29872990 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Wright, L.L., Glade, M.J., and Gopal., J. Pediatr. Res., 22:541544 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Rubin, C.T., Pratt, G.W. Jr., Porter, A.L. Lanyon, L.E. and Poss., R. The use of ultrasound in vivo to determine acute changes in the mechanical properties of bone following intense physical activity. J. Biomechanics, 20:723727 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Abendschein, W. and Hyatt., G.W. Ultrasonic and selected physical properties of bone. Clin. Orthopaedics Research and Related Res. 69:294301 (1970).Google Scholar
6. Leitgeb., L. A new noninvasive quantitative method for fracture diagnosis. Medical Progress through Technology. 11:185190 (1986).Google ScholarPubMed
7. Sehgal, C.M., Lewallan, D.G., Nicholson, J.A., Robb, R.A. and Greenleaf., J.F. Ultrasound transmission and reflection computerized tomography for imaging bones. IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, Chicago, IL Vol.2:849852 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Simonet, W.T., Bronk, J.T., Pinto, M.R., Williams, E.A., Meadows, T.H., Kelly., P.J. Cortical and cancellous bone: Age-Related changes in morphologic features, fluid spaces and calcium homeostasis in dogs. Mayo Clinic Proc. 63:154160 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Sehgal, C.M., Brown, G.M., Bahn, R.C. and Greenleaf., J.F. Measurement and use of acoustic nonlinearity and sound speed to estimate composition of excised livers. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 12:865874 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Rob, R.A., Heffernan, P.B., Camp, J.J. and Hanson., D.P. Workstation for interactive display and quantitative analysis of 3D and 4D biomedical images. IEEE Proceedings of Computer Applications in Medical Care, 240–256 (1986).Google Scholar