Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T01:34:24.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Solubility Calculations at Elevated Temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

C. Ekberg ,
G. Skarnemark ,
A. T. Emrén  and
I. Lundèn
C. Ekberg
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology S-41296, Gothenburg, Sweden
G. Skarnemark
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology S-41296, Gothenburg, Sweden
A. T. Emrén
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology S-41296, Gothenburg, Sweden
I. Lundèn
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology S-41296, Gothenburg, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Computer simulations are commonly used in many areas to obtain information about a system. It is, however, important to remember that the indata to these models are encumbered with errors of varying magnitude. To investigate the effect of these errors, a sensitivityuncertainty (s/u) analysis is often made.

This paper focuses on how the solubility of a solid phase is affected by uncertainties in the enthalpy of reaction for the species present in the solvent. Usually, thermodynamic data are given for a temperature of 25°C, but calculations are not made at this temperature for many practical applications. It is interesting to know which enthalpies are important and how much given uncertainties in these enthalpies affect the calculated solubility of a solid phase.

The solubility calculations were performed by the thermodynamic equilibrium program PHREEQE and the statistical evaluations with a modified version of the SENVAR program.

The solubility of e.g. UO3-2H2O at 80°C was investigated. The conclusion was that the solubility ranged from lE-05 to 4.5E-06 when the enthalpies of reaction for the interesting species were changed within a four kcal/mole wide interval. The maximum solubility, based on an arbitrary distribution, was found to be no greater than 9E-05 with 95% confidence.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 412: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX , 1995 , 889
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ekberg, C., Uncertainties in Safety Analysis. A Literature Survey, SKI report 95:17, Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (SKI), Stockholm, 1995.Google Scholar
2. Final Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel - KBS-3 Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. (SKB), Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
3. Ekberg, C., SENVAR: a Code for Handling Chemical Uncertainties in Solubility Calculations, SKI report 95:18, Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (SKI), Stockholm, 1995.Google Scholar
4. Parkhurst, D. L., Thorstenson, D. C., Plummer, L. N., PHREEE. A Comtr Program for Geochemical Calculations, USGS/WRI p 80–96 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Bond, K. A. et al, Hatches 5.0 -The HARWELL/NIREX Database, Harwell Laboratory, Oxfordshire OX11, ORA, UK, 1992.Google Scholar
6. Grenthe, I. (Chairman), Fuger, J., Konigs, J. M., Muller, A. B., Nguyen-Trung, C. and Warner, H., Chemical Thermodynamics of Uraniuzn, North-Holland, 1992.Google Scholar
7. Drever, J. I., Te geochemistry of natural waters, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1988.Google Scholar
8. Smellie, J., Laaksoharju, M., The Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory: final evaluation of the hydroehemical pre-investigations in relation to existing geologic and hydraulic conditions, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management co. (SKB), TR 92-31 Stockholm, 1992.Google Scholar
9 Nilsson, A-C., Groundwater chemistry monitoring at spo during 1991, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management co. (SKB), progress report, 1992.Google Scholar
10. Ekberg, C., Emrdn, A. T., Finding and Correcting Calculation Errors in F, Proceedings of the Migration-93 Conference, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, pp. 739–742, 1994.Google Scholar
11. SKI Prject-90, SKI TR 91-23, Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (SKI), Stockholm, 1991.Google Scholar