Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T14:44:30.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular characterisation of Armillaria species from Zimbabwe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2003

Eddie MWENJE
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology and Biochemistry, National University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box AC 939 Ascot, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
Brenda D. WINGFIELD
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Tree Pathology Co-operative Programme (TPCP), Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa. E-mail: brenda.wingfield@fabi.up.ac.za
Martin P. A. COETZEE
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Tree Pathology Co-operative Programme (TPCP), Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa. E-mail: brenda.wingfield@fabi.up.ac.za
Michael J. WINGFIELD
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Tree Pathology Co-operative Programme (TPCP), Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa. E-mail: brenda.wingfield@fabi.up.ac.za
Get access

Abstract

Armillaria species are amongst the most important pathogens of trees and have a world-wide distribution. In recent years, the taxonomy of Northern Hemisphere Armillaria spp. has been extensively treated, but those occurring in Africa are poorly known. Previously, isolates of Armillaria from Zimbabwe have been grouped based on morphology and biochemical tests. In this study, six isolates representing the three previously characterized groups of Armillaria spp. occurring in Zimbabwe were analysed using DNA-based techniques. Three distinct clusters emerged from both PCR–RFLP and analysis of sequence data for the IGS-1 rRNA operon. The three groups corresponded to those previously identified based on morphology and biochemical tests. Differences in IGS-1 sequences strongly suggest that the Zimbabwean groups represent three distinct taxa. Isolates belonging to Group I, previously assumed to be to A. heimii, were similar to those identified as A. fuscipes from South Africa and La Reunion. Group II isolates resided in a clade apart from all other isolates and appear to represent A. heimii. The remaining isolates residing in Group III clustered with isolates from Zambia and Cameroon. These are different from A. heimii and A. fuscipes and apparently represent an undescribed taxon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The British Mycological Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)