Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T19:12:28.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparison of Balance Sheet Structures in Major EU Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Joseph P. Byrne  and
E. Philip Davis
Joseph P. Byrne*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research
E. Philip Davis*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Finance, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH
*
e-mail: jbyrne@niesr.ac.uk
e-mail: e_philip_davis@msn.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The UK is commonly viewed as having a ‘market oriented’ financial system, in contrast to other European countries which are seen as ‘bank dominated’. In the light of this supposition, we investigate sectoral balance sheet data for evidence of differences in financial structure between the UK and other major EU countries. It is found that the UK has much in common with Continental countries, in particular France, and they are themselves markedly heterogeneous. There is also some evidence of convergence towards a more market-oriented financial system, even in the most bank-dominated economy, Germany.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 180 , April 2002 , pp. 83 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

The authors thank Ray Barrell and staff of the Commissariat Generale du Plan for helpful suggestions.

References

Allen, F. and Gale, D. (2000), Comparing Financial Systems, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bank of Japan (2000), ‘Points on international comparison of the flow of funds accounts’, Working Paper, Research and Statistics Department, BoJ, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Byrne, J. and Davis, E.P. (2001), ‘Disaggregate wealth and aggregate consumption; an investigation of empirical relationships for the G-7’, Discussion Paper No. 180, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
Davis, E.P. (1986), ‘Portfolio behaviour of the non financial private sectors in the major economies’, Bank for International Settlement, Economic Paper no. 17.Google Scholar
Davis, E.P. (1995a), Pension Funds, Retirement-Income Security and Capital Markets - An International Perspective, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, E.P. (1995b), Debt, Financial Fragility and Systemic Risk,revised and expanded version, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, E.P. (1999), ‘Institutionalization and EMU; implications for European financial markets’, International Finance 2, pp. 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, E.P. (2001), ‘Multiple avenues of intermediation, corporate finance and financial stability’, IMF Working Paper No. 01/115.Google Scholar
Davis, E.P. and Steil, B. (2001), Institutional Investors, MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. and Fischer, K. (1994), Banks, Finance and Investment in Germany, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. and Raviv, A. (1990), ‘Capital structure and the informational role of debt’, Journal of Finance 45, pp. 321–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclennan, D., Muellbauer, J. and Stephens, M. (1998), ‘Asymmetries in housing and financial market institutions and EMU’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14 (3), pp. 54–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R.H., Hackethal, A. and Tyrell, M. (2002), ‘The convergence of financial systems in Europe, main findings of the DFG project’, Schmalenbach Business Review, May.Google Scholar
Scholtens, B. (1997), ‘Bank and market based financial systems - fact or fiction?’ BNL Quarterly Review, 202, pp. 301–323.Google Scholar